9911796707
TMI Blog2025 (1) TMI 888X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... delayed payment of the GST difference - HELD THAT:- Reliance placed on an order Division Bench of this Court in M/S APEX STRUCTURE PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER NEELABH SUGANDHI VERSUS STATE OF M.P. AND OTHERS [ 2024 (12) TMI 928 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT] wherein it is observed ' respondent No.2 is directed to pay the difference of GST amount to the petitioner @ 6% from 01. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... respondent No.2 to release the admitted liability towards the difference of GST amount of Rs. 45,19,000/- along with 18% rate of interest and to support of his contention, leaned counsel for petitioner places reliance on an order Division Bench of this Court dated 12.12.2024 passed in WP No.39378 of 2024 wherein it is observed as under :- With the consent of parties, heard finally. The petitioner ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ore. For the said works the Respondents have issued work orders dated 15/09/2021. The Petitioner as per the instructions and directions of the Project Engineer, Respondent no. 3 has started the execution of the work. 03. The petitioner has been paying the GST from time to time on the payment received on the work executed by it. After enactment of GST Act from 01.07.2017, the petitioner's activ ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rom the State Government, hence, the petitioner has approached this Court by way of present writ petition. 06. Respondents No.2 3 filed a return raising baseless objection regarding maintainability of writ petition, and availability of alternative remedy under the Arbitration Act. 07. Needless to say that no disputed question of facts are involved in this case, therefore, the petitioner cannot be ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
