9911796707
TMI Blog2025 (1) TMI 1030X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... to contain forged signatures - HELD THAT:- Form F dated 12.04.2013, has been executed in front of Advocate Notary from Villupuram namely M/s.Lion M.Pandurangan. It bears the notarial seal and signature of the said Notary dated 22.04.2013. The variance in the date of Form-F as 12.04.2013 and the date of the notarial seal and signature as 22.04.2013 indicates that the said documents was not executed in presence of the said Advocate Notary. The signature of the deceased petitioner and his wife are also in variance with the other documents which have been produced before this Court which are stated to be genuine documents where the deceased petitioner and his wife S.Selvi have affixed their signature. The signature in Power of Attorney dated 15 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... petitioner had entered into a rental agreement dated 22.04.2013 to rent out the demised premises to his son-in-law, namely Mr.M.Veerasekar for the latter's trading business and for getting VAT registration. However, the property of the petitioner has been shown as if it has been mortgaged to secure the interest of the Commercial Tax Department for a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/-. Admittedly, the position of the private property is that the writ petitioner who died during the pendency of the present writ petition and therefore, the legal representatives of the deceased petitioner have been brought on record. 3. It is submitted that the petitioner's daughter and the petitioner's son-in-law are estranged couples. The learned counsel for the p ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ard on the previous occasion, it was suggested that since the security was only for Rs. 1,00,000/-, why not the petitioner or his family members pay the aforesaid amount. 9. That apart, the learned Government Advocate for the respondents submits that having instituted the Criminal proceedings as early as 23.02.2023, the petitioner had not taken any steps to register a private complaint against his estranged son-in-law and therefore, this writ petition is liable to be dismissed. 10. I have considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate for the respondents and also perused the documents that were filed on behalf of the deceased petitioner and Form - F which was also enclosed a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
