2025 (1) TMI 1421

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Ostwal, Adv Mr. Pratyush Kr. Jha, Adv. For the Respondents : Mr. A.K.Yadav, Sr. S.C.-I Mr. Aditya Kumar, A.C. to Sr. S.C.I. Heard both sides. 2. Petitioner in this writ petition has challenged order dated 31.08.2024 passed by the 5th respondent under section 73 of the JGST Act, 2017 for the financial year 2019-20. 3. No doubt the 5th res .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... espondent did not aver to the contention raised in the reply filed by the petitioner and brushed it aside by simply saying it is not satisfactory. 6. Therefore, the impugned order dt. 31.08.2024 is set aside, and the matter is remitted to the 5th respondent who shall furnish to the petitioner the basis of making the demand i.e. breakup as to how the difference amount was arrived at; such informat .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X