TMI Blog2024 (9) TMI 1698X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ot dispute that none of the penalty notices issued to the respondent/assessee for the aforementioned AYs advert to the specific limb of Section 271(1)(c) which is triggered against him. It is not clear whether the AO intended to levy a penalty on the respondent/assessee for concealment of particulars of his income, or furnishing inaccurate particulars. HELD THAT:- There is gross delay of 371 day ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|