2025 (2) TMI 880

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... dharan and Sree Haridev For the Respondent : G. P. Jasmin M.M JUDGMENT Petitioner challenges Ext.P1 show cause notice apart from seeking a direction to pass separate orders for the various financial years and also to grant sufficient time for furnishing a reply for financial years 2018- 2019 to 2023-2024 and provide an opportunity for cross examination. 2. I have heard Sri. K.S. Hariharan Nair .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... y to the petitioner. Though the petitioner contended that an opportunity for cross examination is not being granted and a composite order is proposed to be issued, there is nothing on record to assume that any procedure contrary to law would be adopted by the second respondent. The contention now raised are all assumptions of the petitioner, which cannot be taken into reckoning at this juncture. I .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the appropriate authority. This Court cannot at this juncture assume that the apprehension of the petitioner is legally justified, especially in the absence of any material. 6. However taking note of the apprehension of the petitioner that a composite order will be issued by the second respondent, I am of the view that, insofar as years 2018-2019 onwards are concerned, the petitioner ought to be .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X