Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1987 (1) TMI 99

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... /s. Kesar Enterprises filed the present writ petition for quashing of the order of the Assistant Collector, Customs and Central Excise, Bareilly, dated 19-12-1983. 2. The brief facts of the case are these. M/s. Kesar Sugar Works Ltd., Baheri, district Bareilly is a factory engaged in manufacturing sugar. It manufactured 40896.03 quintals of sugar during the months of May and June, 1973 and appli .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nd June, 1973. The notice was issued under Rule 10-A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, 4. M/s. Kesar Sugar Works Ltd., submitted a reply challenging the validity of recovery proceedings by contending Inter alia, (i) that as per notification rebate could be disallowed if the factory did not work during the base period i.e. 1-10-1971 to 30th September, 1972. Since the factory worked during this p .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... f of the petitioner. On this basis the following order was passed: "I, accordingly, confirm the demand of Rs. 12,26,880.90 paise (Rupees Twelve Lacs Twenty Six Thousand Eight Hundred Eighty and Paise Ninety only) issued against M/s. Kesar Sugar Works Ltd., Baheri, Distt. Bareilly by the Superintendent, Central Excise, M.O.R., Pilibhit. This amount should be deposited by them within a period of t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ondent no. 2, namely, the Collector, Central Excise, Kanpur. In the event of failure to furnish the Bank guarantee, the stay order shall remain automatically vacated". 6. The controversy which has been raised by the petitioners' counsel was that the Assistant Collector committed an error in holding that the petitioner was not entitled to get the rebate as the production of the same months in the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates