Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1989 (9) TMI 104

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he Customs, Excise Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (hereinafter to as `the Tribunal'). 2. The question for consideration in this appeal is, whether the bulb sleeves and tube light sleeves manufactured by the respondent for the purpose of packing the electric bulbs and electric tube lights are `printed boxes and cartons' and are subject to excise duty or whether the respondent is entitled to exemption under Notification No. 66/82 dated 28th February, 1982, as amended by Notification No. 151/83 dated 13th May, 1983. The said amended notification reads as follows : "In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (1) of Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, the Central Government hereby exempts articles of paper or paper .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... applied manually. The tube lamp is inserted in the tube and then put in the outside card box packing. It is the case of the revenue that the respondent manufactured printed cartons for bulbs by way of printing on papers (printed and writing) and pasting the printed paper on the corrugated board and thus converting the said corrugated board to printing cartons. According to the revenue, this process of manufacture renders the carton having printing and paper pasting on the surface to make these manufacture in terms of Section 2(f) of the Act and classifiable under Tariff Item 17(3) as aforesaid. According to the revenue, the exemption contained in the Notification No. 66/82 was not applicable as the Notification exempted articles of paper a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ore passed an order dated 24th November, 1986 for demand of duty of Rs. 1,44,158.12 from the respondent under Rule 9(2) of the said rules and imposed a penalty of Rs. 25,000/- under Rule 173Q. There was an appeal to the Tribunal. The Tribunal referred to Tariff Item 17 pertaining to paper and paperboard. Sub-item (4) of the said item reads as follows : "4. Boxes, cartons, bags and other packing containers (including flattened or folded boxes) and flattened or folded cartons, whether or not printed and whether in assembled or unassembled condition." Tariff Item 17(4) makes a distinction between boxes, cartons, bags and other packing container. There can be no doubt, according to the Tribunal, that boxes, cartons and bags would also be pa .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ld, is of no consequence because in the system of Self Removal Procedure, the respondent is not absolved of the responsibility of bringing the product manufactured by them to the notice of the authorities even if they are using that product for their captive consumption. The respondent had their responsibility. In the light of the Tribunal's findings on the question of classification, the appeal of the respondent was allowed with consequential relief. Revenue challenges the same in this appeal. 4. We have perused the order of the Tribunal. It is evident that one of the meanings, according to the Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, Vol. I, which the Tribunal had referred, is that box is `a case of receptacle usually having a lid' and in vie .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates