9911796707
TMI Blog2025 (4) TMI 1165X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... h Kumar, Advs. For the Respondent Through: Mr. Akash Verma, SSC with Ms. Aanchal Uppal, Adv. Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral) 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. CM APPL. 22003/2025 (for exemption) 2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 4776/2025 3. The present writ petition has been filed by the Petitioner - Mr. Vipin Kumar Mittal (p ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... .5.89 Crores using fake invoices without actual receipt of goods and services. The said Skylark Infra had allegedly received invoices issued by six fake firms, which were found to not be operating at their listed addresses. One among the said six firms was M/s Nivaran Enterprises which is alleged to have further passed on the fraudulently claimed ITC to 47 firms including the Petitioner's firm i.e ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... qua ITC availed from M/s Radhey Enterprises was confirmed against the Petitioner's firm. 7. The case of the Petitioner in this writ petition is that the sum of Rs. 55,15,012/- has been duplicated in both the orders dated 21st January, 2025 and 10th January, 2025, though with a difference of Re. 1/-. It is his submission that the same is a clear error by the Department, therefore, the demands ar ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s Radhey Enterprises i.e. Rs. 14,12,730/- at the initial stage. The Appellate Authority may examine the matter and pass directions in accordance with law. 11. Let the appeal be filed by the Petitioner before the Appellate authority within a period of 30 days. The appeal shall be adjudicated on merits. Needless to add, this Court has not examined the merits of either orders, except the issue of du ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
