TMI Blog1993 (11) TMI 62X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... , seeks quashing of charges framed by the Court of Shri B.S. Mehandiratta dated July 20, 1993. 2. The petitioner is a Proprietor of M/s. Jagannath Nagpal & Co. A notice dated April 6, 1987 was issued to his firm by the Collector, Central Excise & Customs, Chandigarh to show-cause as to why Central Excise duty amounting to Rs. 7,45,223.62 should not be recovered from them as the party had resorted ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 read with Rule 9(1), 52(A), 53, 173G, 173Q read with Rule 226 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 on the same facts on the basis of which show cause notice Annexure P-1 had been issued by the Collector. This complaint in Annexure P. 5. The petitioner filed an application before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Amritsar, bringing to his notice that the appeal had ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|