1993 (12) TMI 72

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed of at this stage alone with suitable observations as the point involved is simple 2.The petitioner-company complains that the Collector (Appeals), before whom its appeal is pending is not deciding the application of the Company for exemption from the condition of pre-deposit of the amount recoverable under the order appealed against and the Department is proceeding to recover the amount. Shri .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... lications for stay pending and in the meanwhile proceeding to recover the amount. 4.Shri Mahajan pressed into service a decision of the Allahabad High Court dated 26-8-1992 in M/s. Kanpur Plastic Pack v. U.O.I. and of this court in Ramdarshan Rolling v. Union of India (Misc. Petition No. 1371/89 decided on 28-1-1992), wherein in the similar circumstances the High Court had intervened and granted .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e interest of the Department itself that these applications are decided without any further loss of time and we expect that the Collector (Appeals) shall dispose them of within a month from today. We are constrained to observe that such complaints are, these days, frequently being brought before the High Court that the Appellate Authority does not decide the application for waiving the condition o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X