2002 (8) TMI 107

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s of the judgment and order of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, West Regional Bench at Mumbai in Appeal No. E/375-376/R/97-Bom., dated November 13, 1997. 2. The point that arises for our consideration is whether "spray paint booth" is an excisable goods chargeable to excise duty under Entry 8424.00 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. 3. To attract .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... it is not mentioned therein under that name even though it has marketability by that name as found by the Tribunal. 5. Further, the question is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in Triveni Engineering Industries Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise [2000 (120) E.L.T. 273 (S.C.)]. In that case, this Court reversed the order of the Tribunal in C.C.E. v. Triveni Engineering Indus .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X