9911796707
TMI Blog2004 (9) TMI 105X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... on an Order dated 14th November, 2003 is sought to be reviewed. 2. The facts necessary for the purposes of this Order are as follows : The Petitioners had imported a ship for breaking purposes. They filed a Bill of Entry. The amount of duty payable was assessed. The Petitioners paid the duty under protest. They then filed a Claim for refund of Rs. 79,64,648/- on the ground that duty had been wro ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... urt in Flock (India)'s case (supra) would not be applicable, notice was issued. 4. We have heard parties at great length. 5. Under Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962 a claim for refund can be made by any person who had (a) paid duty in pursuance of an Order of Assessment or (b) a person who had borne the duty. It has been strenuously submitted that the words "in pursuance of an Order of Assessm ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s would never be over within that period. It was submitted that in the claim for refund the party could take up the contention that the Order of Assessment was not correct and could claim refund on that basis even without filing an Appeal. 6. We are unable to accept this submission. Just such a contention has been negatived by this Court in Flock (India)'s case (supra). Once an Order of Assessmen ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ck (India)'s case (supra), that in the absence of an Appeal having been filed no refund claim could be made. 8. The words "in pursuance of an Order of Assessment" only indicate the party/person who can make a claim for refund. In other words, they enable a person who has paid duty in pursuance of an Order of Assessment to claim refund. These words do not lead to the conclusion that without the Or ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
