TMI Blog1994 (3) TMI 116X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Bill of Entry for home consumption and sought clearance against Appendix 6(1) of AM 1985-88 policy. The Customs Authorities felt that the clearance under OGL was not tenable and the goods were liable to confiscation under Section 111 (d) of the Customs Act. The petitioners were served with a show cause notice and after giving personal hearing, the Deputy Collector of Customs came to the conclusio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... enge the legality of the order. Pending the petition, the petitioners also preferred Appeal before the Collector of Customs (Appeals), Bombay. The Collector of Customs by order dated October 29, 1985 dismissed the appeal but reduced the redemption fine to Rs. 2,000/-. The appellate authority came to the conclusion that notification making amendment was published and the notification provides that ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|