TMI Blog2005 (3) TMI 140X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... March, 2002 dismissing the appeal without going into the merits of the controversy due to non compliance of earlier order of pre-deposit in light of statutory provisions of Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. 2. Heard Mr. Ashish H. Shah, learned Advocate for the petitioners. When the matter had come up on 25th February, 2005 Mr. Shah had prayed for time to report compliance and today it ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|