TMI Blog2009 (2) TMI 221X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... hese petitions, the petitioners have challenged order dated 18-9-2008 [2009 (238) E.L.T. 702 (Tri.-Mumbai)] passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal. It appears that by the order-in-original dated 19-12-1997, the Commissioner of Central Excise confirmed a demand of Rs. 39,53,517/- against M/s. Unique Enterprises, a proprietary concern of Shri F.M. Irani, the petitioner in W ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the petitioner filed applications before the tribunal for restoration of the appeals, which were dismissed as withdrawn. By the impugned order, the applications for restoration of appeals have been dismissed and hence these writ petitions. 3. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. Having regard to the fact that the appeals originally filed were ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|