1993 (8) TMI 89

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the Customs Act, 1962 for review of order-in-appeal No. 140-C/DLH/92, dated 16-10-1992 passed by the Collector of Customs, New Delhi, in the case of Shri Paul D.L. Ratnam. 2. Personal hearing fixed on 20-8-1993 was not attended. Government therefore, proceed with the case on the basis of records as there are no complex issues of the law or facts involved. 3. The case relates to denial of Rule 4 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n training vis-a-vis a person going on work abroad for the purposes of Rule 4A Baggage Rules is not of any consequence in a case like this. It will be improper to deny benefit of Rule 4A to any one going on training abroad, in his capacity as working Government servant, though it is allowable to technicians, skilled and unskilled labours going abroad in various projects with the different agencies .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ns [S. Sunder Pillai v. G.R. Pattabiraman - AIR 1985 SC 582]. 7. In view of the above discussions it is felt that there is no merit in the review proposal. Accordingly, the proceedings initiated vide show cause notice of even number dated 15-1-1993 are hereby dropped. The order of Collector (Appeals) is upheld with consequential relief to the respondent. It is ordered accordingly.
Case laws, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X