9911796707
TMI Blog2001 (4) TMI 134X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ssessee importer against the common Order-in-Appeal Nos. 1487 1511/96, dated 3-9-1996 rejecting the claim of the appellant to import tools and gauges as covered by the Accessories (Condition) Rules, 1962 and also the benefit of concession under customs Notification No. 169/90 dated 3-5-1990 which allowed concession to cucumber. However, the Commissioner (Appeals) has held that it does not cover ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... for de novo consideration as appellant had taken up larger number of grounds and produced several material and evidence to support their case. However, the rejection of the entire claim is in violation of principles of natural justice and in that view of the matter. 2. Ld. Advocate, Shri S. Radhakrishnan submits that either appeals be heard on merits or in the alternative, matter could be reman ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ppeals) has looked into the matter and given a finding which would be sufficient for the purpose of deciding both the appeals. He submits that they themselves had produced break-up value for spare parts, tools and gauges. However, for the purpose of Accessories (Condition) Rules, the entire value has to be given since they have themselves given the break up value, therefore, the assessment was don ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... In that view of the matter, we are of the considered opinion that the impugned orders are required to be set aside and matter remanded to the original authority for de novo consideration. The original authority shall examine the issue in the light of entire material evidence and submissions made by the importer including the plea that spares, tools and gauges are accessories as declared by them in ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
