Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2005 (8) TMI 196

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Rs. 36,24,598/- under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Further he imposed equal penalty under Section 11AC and demanded interest under Section 11AB of the Act. A penalty of Rs. 25,000/- imposed on M/s. Visakhapatnam Port Trust. The appellants have strongly challenged the findings of the Commissioner. 2.Shri G. Shivadass, learned Advocate appeared on behalf of the appellants and Shri Ganesh Havanur, learned SDR appeared on behalf of the Revenue. 3.The learned Advocate made the following submissions :- (i) The liability to Excise duty under Section 3 of the Central Excise Act should arise only if the activity carried out resulted in the manufacture of excisable goods. They should movable and capable of being brought .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... C Ltd. v CCE [2002 (141) E.L.T. 497] (h) CCE, Mumbai v. Josts Engg. Co. Ltd. [2002 (146) E.L.T. 29] (i) Fenner India Ltd. v. CCE, Nagpur [2001 (129) E.L.T. 644] (j) Virdi Brothers v CCE, Indore [2001 (132) E.L.T. 86] (k) Bharat Gears Ltd. v. CCE, Mumbai-VI [2001 (132) E.L.T. 294] (l) Bellis India Ltd, v. CCE, Chennai [2001 (132) E.L.T. 364] (m) CCE, Chandigarh v. Vardhman Spinning Mills [2001 (132) E.L.T. 663] (n) Wintech Taparia Ltd. v. CCE, Indore [2001 (132) E.L.T. 698] (o) ACC Ltd. v. CCE [2001 (133) E.L.T. 375] (p) Cethar Vessels Ltd. CCE [2002 (143) E.L.T. 336] (q) Asea Brown Boveri Ltd. v. CCE, Visakhapatnam [2002 (143) E.L.T. 87] (r) .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... -heading 8428.90, the benefit of Notification No. 67/95-C.E., dated 16-3-1995 would be available to the appellants. Reliance is placed on the following decisions :- (a) Triveni Engineering Indus. Ltd. v. CCE, Allahabad [2001 (136) E.L.T. 617 which has been affirmed by the Apex Court [2002 (139) E.L.T. A310 (S.C.)] (b) Thermax Surface Coating Ltd. v. CCE, Chandigarh [2002 (145) E.L.T. 356] (c) Thermax Surface Coatings Ltd. v. CCE, Chennai-III [2002 (148) E.L.T. 783] (d) Elcon Clipsal India Ltd. v. CCE, Ahmedabad-I [2002 (146) E.L.T. 360] (e) Asea Brown Boveri Ltd. v. CCE, Patna [2003 (154) E.L.T. 493] (f) CCE, Chennai v. Visveswaraya Iron Steel Ltd. [Final Order No. 692/2005, dated 3- .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates