Refund claim rejected as time bared - Since amount was paid as ...

Importer's Refund Claim Denied Due to Time Bar u/s 27 of the Customs Act.

May 1, 2013

Case Laws Customs AT

Refund claim rejected as time bared - Since amount was paid as duty to Custom by the importer, the provision of section 27 of the Custom Act, are applicable - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund claim rejected as time bared - Since amount was paid as ...

Importer's Refund Claim Denied Due to Time Bar u/s 27 of the Customs Act.

May 1, 2013

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

CESTAT upheld rejection of a customs duty refund claim filed on 09.01.2024 relating to payments made via challans between March-December 2017 under EPCG scheme. The...

Refund claim was rejected as time-barred, having been filed beyond the one-year limitation period stipulated u/s 27 of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant had...

HC held that Extra Duty Deposit (EDD) does not constitute customs duty under Section 27 of Customs Act, 1962, but rather functions as a security deposit as clarified in...

CESTAT dismissed an appeal concerning refund claims for excess Countervailing Duty (CVD) on mobile phone imports. The tribunal upheld rejection on three grounds:...

The period of limitation of one year does not apply when the amount claimed as refund has been paid under protest. Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962, only recognizes...

Refund claim of Special Additional Duty (SAD), under Customs Act, in lieu of sales tax - rejection on the ground of time limitation - The Hon’ble High Court has clearly...

Refund of Additional Duty of Customs paid - to allow the limitation period to start from the date of payment of duty as prescribed under the amended notification, would...

Yearly Claim of refund of unutilized cenvat credit - Notification number 27/2012 contemplates for filing of refund claims of unutilised Cenvat credit quarterly, but it...

Refund claim - requirement of re-assessment order of bill of entry - time limitation - As per Chapter 14 of the Customs Manual, Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962 deals...

In this case, the High Court addressed the issue of a rejected refund claim due to being time-barred. The key determination was the relevant date for calculating the...

The case involved a dispute u/s 27 of the Customs Act regarding refund of pre-deposits paid under protest. CESTAT held that when fines and penalties are set aside, the...

The case concerns the time limit for filing a refund claim of Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid by an importer. The issue is whether the one-year limitation specified...

Refund claim in terms of Section 27 of the Customs Act - Rejected being time barred - Anti-dumping duty paid on PVC film - limitation prescribed under Section 27 would...

Refund of Excise Duty, paid under protest - The refund claim is filed within one month after passing of the second Order-in-Appeal which is dated 27.02.2018. The claim...

Denial of refund claim - The fact that the appellant could have challenged the assessment under section 128 of the Customs Act cannot be a reason to deny processing of a...

Quick Updates: