Clandestine removal – Any suspicion whosoever cannot take the ...

Court Sets Aside Rs. 1.85 Crore Demand Due to Lack of Evidence in Clandestine Excisable Goods Case.

July 22, 2013

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Clandestine removal – Any suspicion whosoever cannot take the place of evidence regarding clandestine removal of excisable goods. Moreover, after having positive evidences, quantification of duty on clandestinely removed goods also becomes essential. - Demand of an amount of Rs. 1,85,10,861/- set aside - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Clandestine removal – Any suspicion whosoever cannot take the ...

Court Sets Aside Rs. 1.85 Crore Demand Due to Lack of Evidence in Clandestine Excisable Goods Case.

July 22, 2013

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Clandestine removal of goods denied CENVAT credit. Liability for duty, interest, and penalty from FY 2007-08 to 2011-12 assessed. Differential duty demand of Rs....

The CESTAT disposed of the appeal with the following key holdings: Undervaluation relating to stock transfer to their own unit and sale to sister unit was held not...

CESTAT set aside multiple duty demands totaling over Rs. 2.3 crores against appellant manufacturer of LABSA. Primary allegations of clandestine manufacture and removal...

Confiscation of imported liquor cases, imposition of penalties, and demand of duty. The Tribunal held that there was no intentional misdeclaration or fraudulent intent...

The CESTAT held that the extended period of limitation invoked for levying service tax was unsustainable as there was no wilful suppression of facts by the appellant....

Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

Penalty u/s 271B - no tax audit conducted u/s 44AB - bonafide belief - When Gross profit is more than Rs.4 crores, it means the Gross Receipts were definitely more than...

The CESTAT set aside the demand and penalties imposed on the grounds of alleged clandestine removal, holding that the charge was not substantiated by sufficient evidence....

Clandestine removal demand based on electricity consumption not sustainable as mere electricity consumption cannot be the sole basis for determining duty liability....

Central Excise demands cannot be sustained solely based on confessional statements without corroborative documentary evidence. Retracted affidavits cannot be relied upon...

The Indian Finance Minister's upcoming FY2025-26 Budget presentation focuses on critical fiscal metrics and consolidation targets. The government aims to reduce fiscal...

The demand for recovery of Cenvat Credit was made without proper verification and investigation, based on assumptions and presumptions. The investigation covered only 67...

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) held that the Resolution Plan must provide for payment of Provident Fund and Gratuity dues in accordance with Section...

The HC allowed the petition filed u/s 482 CrPC. It set aside the trial court's condition directing the petitioner, accused of fraudulently availing Input Tax Credit...

Direct tax collections for FY 2023-24 as of 17.06.2023 show net collections of Rs. 3,79,760 crore, a growth of 11.18% compared to the preceding year. - Gross collections...

Quick Updates: