Clandestine removal of goods denied CENVAT credit. Liability for ...

Court Partially Allows Appeal: CENVAT Credit Disallowed, Penalty u/r 26 Set Aside Due to Insufficient Evidence.

July 19, 2024

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Clandestine removal of goods denied CENVAT credit. Liability for duty, interest, and penalty from FY 2007-08 to 2011-12 assessed. Differential duty demand of Rs. 40,70,142/-. Deductions for discounts, octroi, and cess paid allowed, reducing net duty payable to Rs. 3,81,322/-. Duty demand of Rs. 43,19,238/- for clearance of imported showers held unsustainable as processes carried out amounted to manufacture. Cenvat credit demand of Rs. 27,61,517/- on imported parts disallowed. Duty demand of Rs. 3,12,373/- on alleged clandestine clearance set aside due to lack of evidence. Penalty u/r 26 set aside. Differential duty of Rs. 3,81,322/- with interest and penalty upheld. Remaining demands set aside. Appeals partially allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Clandestine removal of goods denied CENVAT credit. Liability for ...

Court Partially Allows Appeal: CENVAT Credit Disallowed, Penalty u/r 26 Set Aside Due to Insufficient Evidence.

July 19, 2024

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Cenvat credit on Roadside Assistance Service allowable as post-sale customer facilitation service related to business. Credit on Market Research Study disallowed as...

Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

Penalty imposed u/r 26 of Central Excise Rules 2002 set aside due to violation of principles of natural justice and lack of evidence. Department's case based solely on...

Levy of penalty on Proprietor of the Firm under Rule 26(2) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - fraudulent availment of CENVAT Credit - Taking note of the fact that penalty...

Penalty for non deduction of tax at source - bona fide belief proved - penalty set aside - AT

CESTAT partly allowed appeal concerning duty demands on DTA sales by SEZ unit. Court held Commissioner of Customs has jurisdiction to demand duty on unauthorized DTA...

The High Court considered the legality of a penalty imposed u/s 31(3) of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981, due to the want of Form 28B. The issue was whether the defendants...

Penalty u/r 26(1) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - charge of abating the evasion of duty by the Main Party - The appellant argued that since the main party's case of duty...

Reduction in quantum of penalty imposed under Rule 26(2) (i) & (ii) - the Tribunal would say that there is no revenue loss because M/s.Sujana Metal Products Limited have...

The assessee failed to claim the Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) credit in the original income tax return and did not file a revised return. The Assessing Officer (AO) did...

Rejection of application for condonation of delay in preferring the application u/s 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act - No application for setting aside the...

Imposition of penalty under Rule 26 (2) of CER - availment of irregular CENVAT Credit - invoices without actual receipt of inputs - Though the opting of SVLDRS should...

Cenvat Credit case involving invoices issued by Merchant Exporter for services related to fulfilling Minimum Indicative Export Quota and invoices from U.P. Sugar Mills...

The Appellate Court exceeded its jurisdiction u/s 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by setting aside an arbitral award that had already been confirmed...

Classification of micronutrient fertilizers - Presence of nitrogen as a chelating agent - essential constituent - In this remand back case from the Supreme Court, the...

Quick Updates: