Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2013 Year 2013 This

If the expert bodies, judicial as well as quasi judicial, have ...

Case Laws     Central Excise

July 30, 2013

If the expert bodies, judicial as well as quasi judicial, have interpreted the law in favour of the assessee, the assessee cannot be held guilty of any suppression or mis-statement etc., longer period of limitation is not allowed - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Fees which can be charged by Investment Advisers from their clients - SEBI is an expert regulatory body established under the SEBI Act and the Court, therefore, would...

  2. Disciplinary proceedings against formerly Appellate Deputy Commissioner - If the order passed by the quasi judicial authority is taken as a foundation for bringing the...

  3. The High Court held that the impugned Press Release by the Ministry of Finance, purporting to direct judicial and quasi-judicial authorities to classify all...

  4. Benefit of SabkaVishwas Legal Dispute Resolution Scheme (SVLDRS), 2019 - The High Court observed that, the Supreme Court had an effect of extending the period of...

  5. Composition of Adjudicating Authority under PMLA and its Jurisdiction - Whether the quasi judicial bodies should consist of members having requisite qualification in the...

  6. Allowing deduction not claimed by the assessee in its return of income u/s.54B - the Income Tax laws are welfare in nature and the very purpose of welfare legislation is...

  7. Deduction u/s 80IB - Central Sales-tax assessment order is a quasi judicial order which cannot be ignored and in case we believe the story of Revenue authorities it will...

  8. Audit Objections – relevance in making re-assessments - The function of the audit is essentially executive in nature, while the function of the assessing officer and his...

  9. The Delhi High Court upheld the order quashing of the disciplinary proceedings against the Regional Director (NR) of ROC, emphasizing the distinction between executive...

  10. Misue of high positions of “Commissioner” - Provisional release of seized goods - It seems that the Additional Commissioner, while passing this order has not acted as...

  11. The tribunal allowed several of the assessee's appeals, directing adjustments in tax computations and granting deductions previously disallowed. It dismissed some...

  12. Classification - Import of ‘Accordion springs’ - The Tribunal rejected the appellant's reliance on expert opinions, stating that classification is a quasi-judicial...

  13. The decisions of the Hon’ble non-jurisdictional High Court have no relevance in the present context. It is also elementary in law that the mere pendency of the appeal,...

  14. Judicial discipline - Where facts and law in a subsequent assessment year are the same, no authority whether quasi judicial or judicial can generally be permitted to...

  15. Capital gain computation - FMV determination - The opinion of an expert cannot be brushed aside in a whimsical manner. Specially when law mandates the evidence of an...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates