If the expert bodies, judicial as well as quasi judicial, have ...

Court Rulings Favor Assessee: Longer Limitation Period Not Allowed Due to No Suppression or Misstatement Found.

July 30, 2013

Case Laws Central Excise AT

If the expert bodies, judicial as well as quasi judicial, have interpreted the law in favour of the assessee, the assessee cannot be held guilty of any suppression or mis-statement etc., longer period of limitation is not allowed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

If the expert bodies, judicial as well as quasi judicial, have ...

Court Rulings Favor Assessee: Longer Limitation Period Not Allowed Due to No Suppression or Misstatement Found.

July 30, 2013

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

The Rajasthan High Court examined the validity of revision proceedings u/s 263 concerning the period of limitation. The issue was whether the period of limitation for...

Invoking the extended period of limitation u/s 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act for recovery of unpaid duty. The key points are: The department alleged suppression of...

HC held reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 148 were invalid due to statutory limitation u/s 149. The original notice was set aside for lacking mandatory approvals...

Offshore unit in Dubai treated as proprietary concern, profits taxable in assessee's hands. AO's addition disallowed based on ITAT's consistent rulings favoring assessee....

The CESTAT held that for invoking the extended period of limitation u/s 11A(4) of the Central Excise Act, there must be a deliberate attempt to evade payment of duty....

The High Court allowed the petitions challenging the assessment orders for 2017-18, 2018-19, and 2019-20 on the grounds of limitation and violation of principles of...

The HC quashed the attachment of the petitioner's banking account, following precedent established in Sri Ganapathi Pandi Industries (2024). The Court determined that...

Law of Limitation - Insolvency Proceedings - Apex Court's Ruling

Appellant challenged levy of service tax on commission paid to foreign agents for export of goods during Sep 2013-Sep 2014 under reverse charge, denial of CENVAT credit,...

In a recent High Court case, the issue of whether advertisement expenditure could be considered as allowable revenue expenditure was discussed. The ITAT allowed the...

HC determined that invoking extended limitation period under First Proviso to Section 73(1) of Finance Act 1994 was unjustified. Following P&B Pharmaceuticals and...

Extended period of limitation - if Cenvat Credit has been allowed in respect of the same services to the other assessee’s there is no justifiable reason for denying the...

Extended period of limitation - works contract - suppression of facts or not - Unless the adjudicating authority had come to a conclusion that the extended period of...

Validity of reopening of assessment - period of limitation to issue notice - validity of a notice issued under Section 148/148A - scope of Taxation and other laws...

Refund of Additional Duty of Customs paid - to allow the limitation period to start from the date of payment of duty as prescribed under the amended notification, would...

Quick Updates: