When CIT [A] and the Tribunal both concurrently came to the ...

Case Laws Income Tax

August 9, 2013

When CIT [A] and the Tribunal both concurrently came to the conclusion that there is no evidence supporting the AO's version that the assessee had invested large amount in purchase of the land, then no substantial question of law arises - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

When CIT [A] and the Tribunal both concurrently came to the ...

Case Laws Income Tax

August 9, 2013

You may also like:

Assessee voluntarily declared income under "income from other sources" in return. AO disallowed deduction claimed for coordination and settlement expenses due to lack of...

The Appellate Tribunal upheld the reopening of assessment u/s 147 due to the assessee providing bogus accommodation loss entries. The AO had reasons to believe in the...

Excess stock found during the course of survey - unexplained investments u/s 69 r.w.s.115BBE - The ITAT concluded that the addition made by the AO was not justified....

The Appellate Tribunal addressed various issues in the case. The AO made additions based on uncorroborated documents seized from a third party. The Tribunal held that...

Unexplained cash credits u/s 68 and the applicability of Section 115BBE for taxing such additions. The key points are: The Assessing Officer (AO) issued notices u/s...

The Appellate Tribunal considered an ex-parte assessment u/s 144 and an application for additional evidence. The Tribunal held that since the assessment was completed...

Source of cash deposit during demonetization period - AO has not refuted or discredited these evidences and documents. AO does not mention why he is not accepting these...

Bogus purchase bills from certain ‘hawala’ dealers - The Tribunal found the assessee failed to substantiate the genuineness of the purchases from alleged Hawala dealers,...

The ITAT Hyderabad held that the addition of bogus purchases based on information from the Investigation Wing was not justified. The burden of proof shifted to the AO...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the legality of additions based on a diary seized from a third party. The Tribunal held that the presumption u/s 132(4A) of the Act...

Cash deposit during demonetization period treated as unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - CIT(A) sustained addition u/s 69A based on lack of supporting evidence for cash...

Bogus share transactions involving abnormal price rise in penny stock shares - Assessee produced evidence of share purchase, existence in demat account - AO failed to...

Taxability of income in India - Proof of residence - assessee is a non-resident corporate entity incorporated under laws of Mauritius - The Tribunal held that the...

The assessee provided documentary evidence supporting the purchase and subsequent sale of shares leading to long-term capital gains (LTCG). The evidence included...

The case pertains to the rejection of provisional registration u/ss 12AB/80G for charitable activities. The Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) concluded that the assessee...

Quick Updates: