CIT failed to discharge his statutory duty and instead of taking ...

CIT's Order Quashed for Failing to Identify Assessing Officer's Errors as Required by Section 263.

August 12, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax AT

CIT failed to discharge his statutory duty and instead of taking a clear call and demonstrating errors made by assessing officer and prejudice caused to the revenue, the buck has been passed on to assessing officer by setting aside assessment order, which is against the letter and spirit of provisions of sec.263. Where the authority fails to carry out its statutory obligation, the order cannot be held as tenable and is liable to be quashed. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

CIT failed to discharge his statutory duty and instead of taking ...

CIT's Order Quashed for Failing to Identify Assessing Officer's Errors as Required by Section 263.

August 12, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Assessing Officer to usurp the jurisdiction to reopen the assessment - The first Assessing Officer has made the reassessment after...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - assessee had failed to provide full submissions - penalty levied by the Assessing Officer u/s 271(1)(b) of the IT Act deserves to be...

Revision u/s 263 - PCIT has used only probability and likelihood to find the error in the assessment order which is not permitted, he ought to find out specific error in...

The High Court held that reopening of assessment u/s 147 was not valid where the Assessing Officer had previously examined the claim for deduction of foreign exchange...

Validity of assessment order - Since, the levy of tax under the Act on the sale of goods during the course of import was an error apparent on the face of the record, the...

Revision u/s 263 - bogus purchase - proof of nexus between the purchases and sales - once submission/reply filed by the assessee, pursuant to enquiry by the Assessing...

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving a revision u/s 263, where the Commissioner contended that the Assessing Officer did not adequately inquire into Long...

Appellate Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer failed to provide findings for rejecting assessee's claim of exemption as a startup from applicability of section...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The Appellate Tribunal observed that the appellant, during reassessment proceedings, had filed their return of income but failed to provide...

Reopening of assessment - allegation of undisclosed source of purchase of property - If the Assessing Officer has to say that there are two properties purchased, either...

Rectification of mistake u/s 154 - Disallowance of provision for ex-gratia - CIT(A) has provided an opportunity to the assessing officer to examine the mistake committed...

Validity of assessment order - difference of turnover between P & L account and balance sheet, on the one hand, and GSTR-9, on the other - The High Court Noted that the...

The Appellate Tribunal examined the validity of the reassessment notice issued u/s 148 and the consequent order passed u/s 147 regarding the addition made by the...

The High Court quashed the reopening of assessments u/s 148, holding that the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer were cryptic, vague, lacking nexus, and...

Assessment u/s 147 versus 153C - choice of correct course of assessment. The assessee's name featured in the list of beneficiaries of accommodation entries by way of...

Quick Updates: