Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2024 Year 2024 This

Appellate Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer failed to ...


Tribunal: AO failed to justify rejecting startup's exemption claim under 56(2)(viib). CIT(A) endorsed AO's reasoning sans addressing exemption claim. Remanded for fresh adjudication.

Case Laws     Income Tax

July 25, 2024

Appellate Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer failed to provide findings for rejecting assessee's claim of exemption as a startup from applicability of section 56(2)(viib) regarding valuation of unquoted equity shares. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) merely endorsed Assessing Officer's reasoning for not accepting valuation report without addressing assessee's claim. The issue was remanded to Assessing Officer to consider assessee's claim of startup exemption from section 56(2)(viib) after providing opportunity of hearing.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Assessee issued shares at fair market value computed as per Rule 11UA(2), but Assessing Officer (AO) and CIT(A) rejected valuation without justification. Statute...

  2. The ITAT Ahmedabad addressed the validity of an assessment by the AO on issues beyond those covered by a notice u/s 143(2) issued under CASS for limited scrutiny,...

  3. Applicability of Section 56(2)(x) and the jurisdiction of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT), Jaipur-1, in revising the order u/s 263. The key points are:...

  4. The ITAT Raipur considered the addition u/s 69 or 56(2)(vii)(b) concerning the variance between guideline rates and actual purchase prices of immovable property. The...

  5. The Appellate Tribunal considered whether the assessee, a trust registered u/s 12AA, qualified for exemption u/s 11 as a charitable entity. The AO argued the trust's...

  6. Addition u/s 50C r.w.s. 56(2)(vii) (b) - the buyer of the property - The Tribunal (ITAT) ruled that since the assesses were buyers, Section 50C did not apply, and...

  7. Enhancement made by the Ld. CIT(A) u/s 251(1) r.w.s. 56(2) (viib) - AO substituted fair market value determined by the assessee through his own valuation - Assessees...

  8. Addition u/s. 56(2)(viib) - transaction of sale of agricultural land - consideration as per the stamp value - The Tribunal admitted additional evidence provided by the...

  9. AO cannot interfere in assessee's chosen valuation method u/s 56(2)(viib). AO exceeded jurisdiction by rejecting DCF method and applying NAV method. Transaction between...

  10. Addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) - AO referred the valuation of property to Valuation Cell and DVO - difference between the DVO value and consideration paid for purchase of...

  11. Addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii) - FMV of property - The events subsequent to the transaction of “transfer” of the immovable property under consideration will have no...

  12. Conversion of loan into share capital attracts provisions of Section 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act. The term 'consideration' used in the section has wide...

  13. Addition u/s 56(2)(viib) - excess premium collected on issue of equity shares from resident individuals - assessee is a recognized startup from DPIIT, Ministry of...

  14. The ITAT considered the issue of addition u/s 2(22)(b) r.w.s. 56(2)(viia) concerning the treatment of bonus shares received by the assessee. The AO treated the bonus...

  15. Addition u/s 56(2)(viib) - Share Capital - excessive Share premium - closely held company - Rule 11UA - Assessee has failed to explain and justify issue of preference...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates