Service tax demand u/s 73A – sale of flats - collection of ...

Service Tax Demand Dismissed: "Contingent Liability" Label on Collected Amount for Flat Sales u/s 73A.

August 24, 2013

Case Laws Service Tax AT

Service tax demand u/s 73A – sale of flats - collection of amount towards service tax but not as service tax - contingent liability – appellant took the precaution of collecting it as ‘contingent liability' and not as service tax per se – he also made it clear that in case the outcome of the judicial proceedings emerges in their favour, the amount would be refunded along with interest - No demand - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Service tax demand u/s 73A – sale of flats - collection of ...

Service Tax Demand Dismissed: "Contingent Liability" Label on Collected Amount for Flat Sales u/s 73A.

August 24, 2013

Case Laws Service Tax AT

You may also like:

Demand of service tax - they are liable to pay the Service Tax on the amount collected by them as an advance prior to introduction of Service Tax liability on said services - AT

Effect of negative regime on Construction of Complex Services - tri-partite agreement - providing free of cost flats to all the existing members of the Society in lieu...

Dispute regarding non-payment/short payment of service tax, tax demand and interest u/ss 73(2) and 75, penalties u/ss 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and extended...

Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

Management, Maintenance or Repair Services - amounts collected under the head 'backup power supply' - No service tax.

CESTAT ruled in favor of appellant regarding service tax liability on GTA services during 2008-2013. The Tribunal determined service tax liability shifted to service...

Self Adjustment of excess service tax paid with the service tax liabilities for subsequent period - Service tax amount paid at higher rate for the service tax...

Service tax liability cannot be imposed twice on the same transaction. The appellant, as a service recipient, was required to pay 75% of the service tax under the...

The appellant wrongly availed Cenvat credit on input services for unsold flats after issuance of completion certificate, contravening Rules 6(3) and 6(3A) of the Cenvat...

When a service provider has already paid 100% service tax on manpower supply and security services, demanding the same service tax from the service recipient, who is...

Once a service is subjected to service tax, the same service cannot be taxed again, as it would amount to double taxation, which is impermissible. In this case, even...

Sale of space for advertisement service - Department is seeking to levy service tax on the amounts collected by appellant as advertisement tax - Not liable to service...

Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

Liability to pay service tax for services provided to a foreign entity. The appellant argued that their turnover within the domestic market was below the threshold...

Eligibility to make adjustment of excess service tax paid against future service tax liability - Claim of Excess service tax paid due to issuance of revised invoice -...

Quick Updates: