Penalty - whether wrong mentioning of provisions for invoking ...

High Court Rules Incorrect Citation Doesn't Invalidate Penalty Order; Tribunal's Decision to Delete Penalty Overturned.

October 5, 2013

Case Laws Central Excise HC

Penalty - whether wrong mentioning of provisions for invoking penalty would render the order illegal – Held No - tribunal is wrong in deleting the penalty - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty - whether wrong mentioning of provisions for invoking ...

High Court Rules Incorrect Citation Doesn't Invalidate Penalty Order; Tribunal's Decision to Delete Penalty Overturned.

October 5, 2013

Case Laws Central Excise HC

You may also like:

Message for the tribunal - All this effort and time would have been saved if the Tribunal had made specific reference to contrary decisions or not stated so in the...

Validity of policy decision - Imposing prohibition on export of Shark fins of all species of Shark - The rationality of the decision cannot be adjudged on a proof of...

The CIT(A) partly allowed and restricted the addition on account of commission expenses at 0.25% as compared to 2% adopted by the Assessing Officer. The coordinate bench...

Scope of challenge to orders passed by the ITSC - Validity of exercising discretion by the ITSC in granting relief to the assessee - Granting immunity from prosecution...

Rectification application u/s 254 - Tribunal not followed the decision on the identical facts by the Coordinate Bench which is confirmed by this Court - The Court...

Assessment u/s 153A was quashed due to improper approval granted u/s 153D by JCIT through a common mechanical communication without application of mind. Addition u/s...

Various disallowances and additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's (ITAT) decisions on the same. The key points are: 1)...

Validity of assessment made u/s 147 instead of u/s. 153C - Addition as unexplained cash credit u/s. 68 - Upon examination, the ITAT Delhi found that the seized material,...

Key legal issues and the Tribunal's holdings: Agricultural land sold by assessee situated beyond municipal limits cannot be treated as capital asset u/s 2(14). Addition...

ITAT Bangalore recalled its order dated 30.12.2024 concerning the taxability of investments worth Rs. 669.27 crores in Buckeye Trust under Section 56(2)(x) of Income Tax...

Dishonor of cheque - If a notice is given on the basis of incorrect cheque number, then the entire foundation will fall and the complainant cannot maintain his complaint...

Incorrect Data in certain IECs - corrective action required from exporters

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed as the assessee did not make disallowance u/s 14A or compute income for administrative/indirect common expenses incurred in relation to...

ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to jurisdictional defects in notice issuance under s.148. ITO Ward 3(2), Bulandsahar transferred assessee's records to ITO...

Replacement of the Resolution Professional - The decision taken by the CoC is a decision by vote of 66% and when the decision is by votes of a collective body, the...

Quick Updates: