ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to jurisdictional ...

ITO's Section 148 Notice Void After Jurisdiction Transfer - Reassessment Quashed Due to Invalid Notice Issuance

February 18, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to jurisdictional defects in notice issuance under s.148. ITO Ward 3(2), Bulandsahar transferred assessee's records to ITO Ward-Exemption, Ghaziabad on 08.04.2018, but improperly issued s.148 notice on 26.03.2018 after transferring jurisdiction. Revenue failed to establish valid jurisdiction of ITO Bulandsahar for notice issuance. Assessment completed by ITO Ghaziabad under s.144/147 was deemed void ab initio due to invalid initiating notice. Tribunal quashed reassessment order, holding that lack of proper jurisdiction at notice stage invalidated entire proceedings.

View Source

← Previous Next →

ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to jurisdictional ...

ITO's Section 148 Notice Void After Jurisdiction Transfer - Reassessment Quashed Due to Invalid Notice Issuance

February 18, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The court held that the Joint Assessing Officer (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act for reassessment, as per Section 151A read with...

Reassessment proceedings were held invalid due to lack of proper jurisdiction by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax while issuing the notice u/s 148. The...

Validity of reassessment order - Notice sent on wrong (old) E-mail ID - The petitioner company had two email addresses, one used until 2019 and another operational since...

Validity of reassessment proceedings for non-issuance of statutory notice u/s 143(2) - Since notice u/s 143(2) of the Act was not issued to the assessee, before...

Section 143(2) is a mandatory requirement, and failure to comply with it renders the reassessment proceedings invalid. The High Court has consistently held that Section...

Reassessment notices issued u/s 148 for assessment years 2018-19, 2019-20, and 2020-21 were time-barred by limitation. Withdrawal of approval u/s 10(23C)(vi) by the...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Validity of approval u/s 151 - notice not issued by Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) - There is no concurrent jurisdiction for Joint...

Faceless assessment regime mandated u/s 151A - Jurisdictional Assessing Officer not permitted to issue notice u/s 148, as it would breach Section 151A provisions - No...

Notice u/s 143(2) issued by a non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer/Deputy Commissioner is invalid and cannot be cured. The assessment order framed u/s 143(3) based on...

Notice issued against dissolved firm invalid; firm ceased to exist, rendering reassessment proceedings untenable. Apex Court's decision in Maruti Suzuki case mandates...

The High Court held that the reassessment notice issued beyond the period of limitation was invalid and without jurisdiction. The impugned notice itself was illegal, and...

The ITAT held that the assessment years 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12 were beyond the 10-year limitation period u/s 153C read with Explanation-1 to section 153A. Hence,...

Jurisdiction of income tax authorities - Transfer of case u/s 127 - No document has been produced on the file by the Department to show that the case was transferred by...

ITAT quashed assessment order due to jurisdictional defect in notice issuance under Section 143(2). While ACIT had pecuniary jurisdiction to conduct assessment of...

The High Court held that for a valid reassessment notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, the Revenue must comply with Section 151A, which mandates the issuance of such...

Quick Updates: