Power of ITAT to stay the proceedings initiated for levy of ...

ITAT Has Authority to Stay Penalty Proceedings, Ensuring Efficient Management of Tax-Related Matters Under Its Jurisdiction.

December 9, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Power of ITAT to stay the proceedings initiated for levy of penalty - ITAT have jurisdiction and/or power of doing all such acts, or employing such means, as are essentially necessary to its execution - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Power of ITAT to stay the proceedings initiated for levy of ...

ITAT Has Authority to Stay Penalty Proceedings, Ensuring Efficient Management of Tax-Related Matters Under Its Jurisdiction.

December 9, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Arbitral Proceedings - Computation of one-year period for completing the proceedings - exclusion of days during which the proceedings were stayed - The High Court...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the assessee's appeal and directed the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act to be deleted. The Assessing Officer...

Stay of the order passed u/s 263 though there is no active demand of tax - Power of ITAT power to grant stay - Future demand - CIT issued directions to the AO - Whether...

The court held that Section 6(2)(b) of the Act treats the empowered officers under the SGST/UGST Act at the central level to be at par and does not prescribe for...

Offence u/s 276(C)(2) and 277 - Allegation of willful tax evasion and non-payment of admitted tax - compounding application. The petitioner submitted income tax return...

Stay of demand - payment of 20% of the outstanding demand - ITAT rejecting its application for stay on the recovery of demand during the pendency of appeal - The Delhi...

ITAT set aside penalty under s271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act following deletion of quantum addition in earlier proceedings. The underlying dispute involved classification...

The High Court held that prosecution u/ss 276C, 277, 278B, and 278E for tax evasion was invalid as it violated CBDT guidelines. Prosecution was premature without the...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Failure of the assessee to explain the source of cash deposit in the bank account - burden of proof - The ITAT acknowledged the...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - As the penalty proceedings are distinct and independent to the quantum proceedings, in our considered view, penalty cannot be levied merely on...

HC set aside penalty order u/s 270A and notice of demand u/s 156 due to procedural oversight. Department acknowledged they weren't informed about pending appeal...

Penalty proceedings under CGST Act cannot be initiated after State GST Authorities have initiated proceedings on the same subject matter. Once proceedings are initiated...

Management, Maintenance or Repair Service - Software Services Agreement - repair and maintenance of software - stay granted - AT

The case involves the classification of services as Management or Business Consultant Services for tax purposes, specifically in relation to merger and acquisitions. The...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be imposed for an ad-hoc disallowance of 20% of expenses made by the Assessing Officer....

Quick Updates: