Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2014 Year 2014 This

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Where an assesse has exercised a bona ...


Penalty for Incorrect Tax Claims u/s 271(1)(c) Only If Intent to Evade is Proven.

January 11, 2014

Case Laws     Income Tax     HC

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Where an assesse has exercised a bona fide right but the deductions or exemptions so claimed are found to be incorrect, penalty would follow only if the claim is raised with intent to furnish incorrect particulars and to evade tax - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - weighted deduction u/s 35(1)(ii) claimed in the original return and later in the return filed in response to notice u/s 148 of the Act,...

  2. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed for excess deduction claimed u/s 10B. The assessee furnished all relevant facts for computing total income, and provided detailed...

  3. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Making an incorrect claim in law cannot tantamount to furnishing inaccurate particulars under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere making of a...

  4. Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

  5. Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

  6. The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

  7. The assessee had conceded the compensation income to be included as income from other sources. However, upon judicial examination, the compensation was found to be...

  8. Penalty u/s 271(1)(C) - Unexplained Expenditure on Stamp Duty and Registration Charges made out of Undisclosed Income - There was no dishonest intent of the assessee...

  9. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - there is no ‘tax sought to be evaded’, in terms of Explanation 4 to section 271(1)(c), on which penalty could be levied - even as the asessee has...

  10. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed for denying deduction u/s 80DD for a disabled person with over 80% disability. The assessee, a retired individual, had submitted...

  11. Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

  12. Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - bona fide or mala fide with an intention to evade taxes - not exigible to levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act where the...

  13. Voluntary surrender of income by assessee cannot be considered concealment. AO failed to prove concealment, merely concluded voluntary surrender as concealment....

  14. Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - deduction claimed u/s 80IA - there being no factual basis for establishing that the expenses needed to be allocated and the expenses so...

  15. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Having capitalized the amount of foreign exchange fluctuation in the relevant block of assets reveals its clear intent of treating it as capital...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates