Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - there is no ‘tax sought to be evaded’, ...

No Penalty Under IT Act Section 271(1)(c) Without "Tax Sought to Be Evaded," Per Explanation 4. Assessee Non-Explanation Irrelevant.

May 25, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - there is no ‘tax sought to be evaded’, in terms of Explanation 4 to section 271(1)(c), on which penalty could be levied - even as the asessee has not furnished any explanation during the penalty proceedings or in the appellate proceedings no penalty is leviable

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - there is no ‘tax sought to be evaded’, ...

No Penalty Under IT Act Section 271(1)(c) Without "Tax Sought to Be Evaded," Per Explanation 4. Assessee Non-Explanation Irrelevant.

May 25, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

The ITAT held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was not imposable on the assessee. The assessee had voluntarily paid tax on income from sale of shares three years prior to...

Non-filer assessee had taxable income but failed to file return u/s 139(1), later filed return in response to notice u/s 148 without considering section 50C provisions,...

Voluntary surrender of income by assessee cannot be considered concealment. AO failed to prove concealment, merely concluded voluntary surrender as concealment....

Interest u/s 234B - The term “assessed tax” has been defined in Explanation-1 of Section 234B (1). As per said Explanation-1 “assessed tax” means the tax on the total...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - when the assessee company had been assessed to tax under the deeming provisions of Sec. 115JB of the Act, therefore, on the basis of our...

Rectification of mistake - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Since the concealment of income referred to in 271(1)(c) of the Act is in respect of tax sought to be evaded is...

Penalty u/s 271B - no tax audit conducted u/s 44AB - bonafide belief - When Gross profit is more than Rs.4 crores, it means the Gross Receipts were definitely more than...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed for excess deduction claimed u/s 10B. The assessee furnished all relevant facts for computing total income, and provided detailed...

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal u/s 249(4)(b) due to non-payment of advance tax. The assessee did not respond to the notice u/s 142(1) to clarify tax payment....

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - proof of contravention of provisions provided under explanation 5A to section 271(1)(c) - On reference to the provisions of explanation 5A to...

Explanation versus bona finde explanation versus proper disclosure - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - AT

Quick Updates: