Tribunal could not have ordered deposit of Rs. 15,00,000/- ...

Case Laws Central Excise

August 8, 2011

Tribunal could not have ordered deposit of Rs. 15,00,000/- merely because the contention of the appellant that the goods in question could be classified under Tariff Heading 3916 is not acceptable to the appellant .... - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Tribunal could not have ordered deposit of Rs. 15,00,000/- ...

Case Laws Central Excise

August 8, 2011

You may also like:

The Appellate Tribunal found the Appellant Company guilty of contravening u/s 9(1)(a) of FERA 1973 by making payments to a person outside India without RBI permission....

The case involves imposition of penalty on a Customs House Agent (CHA) u/s 114 (iii) of the Customs Act 1962 for misusing drawback benefit through fraudulent exports....

Jurisdiction of Superintendent to pass the order - Monetary limit - The High Court noted that, the circular dated 9.2.2018 limited the power of the Superintendent,...

Penalty for violation of Section 15HB of SEBI Act, 1992 - justification for the Tribunal to reduce the penalty below Rs. 1,00,000/- which is the minimum as permissible -...

Petitioner pre-deposited Rs. 6,25,000/- as condition for filing appeal u/s 51 of TNVAT Act against Assessment Order dated 21.10.2010. After revised Assessment Order on...

Applicability of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) provisions to a non-resident bank and its CEO. The bank was charged with contravening sections 64(2), 6(4),...

Imported goods classification disputed - whether silver jewellery freely importable or restricted category under ITC (HS) Code 71069210. Court found respondent's...

The Appellate Tribunal held that for determining the holding period of a property or calculating long-term capital gains, the date of allotment of the property is...

Amendment to rules governing salary, allowances and service conditions of Chairperson and members of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India. Key changes: Chairperson's...

The notification amends the National Financial Reporting Authority (Manner of Appointment and other Terms and Conditions of Service of Chairperson and Members) Rules,...

The ITAT Visakhapatnam addressed an addition u/s 69A for unexplained cash deposits in the bank account. The assessee failed to explain the sources for cash deposits,...

The court held that the tax liability arising from the deletion of additions under the remand order would be less than Rs. 1,00,00,000, rendering the appeal...

Reopening of assessment beyond three years requires sanction from Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, whereas the assessee obtained sanction from Principal...

The High Court considered a case involving the release of seized goods u/s 110A. The issue was the non-issuance of a show cause notice within the stipulated time due to...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that cash found in two lockers belonged to RNB Temple Trust and Ram Bajaj Foundation. The Trust's balance sheet showed cash in...

Quick Updates: