Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2014 Year 2014 This

Benefit of exemption Notification No. 61/86-C.E., dated ...


Driver's Seats for Hydraulic Excavators: Benefits Confirmed Only Within Normal Limitation Period Under Exemption Notification No. 61/86-C.E.

February 17, 2014

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Benefit of exemption Notification No. 61/86-C.E., dated 10-2-1986 - Benefit to driver's seats meant for hydraulic excavators - demand within the normal period of limitation is only confirmed - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Demand beyond normal period of limitation - Whether waiver of penalty u/s 80 would mean that no demand can be confirmed beyond the normal period of limitation - stay...

  2. Benefit of exemption - At the time of filing the Bill of Entry the appellant have to submit the documents including the country of origin certificate which the appellant...

  3. Demand of duty by denying the benefit of exemption - Capital goods for specific use - Merely based on presumption that few of the hydraulic excavators procured from...

  4. Cash payment to lorry driver - assessee's only claim before the authorities was that the driver acted in dual capacity, for which there is no evidence - disallowance u/s...

  5. The High Court held that the petitioners have the option to file writ petitions challenging the orders of the Revisionary Authority either before the High Court within...

  6. HC quashed order relating to Input Tax Credit (ITC) claims that were time-barred under Section 16(4) of CGST Act but fell within limitation under Section 16(5)....

  7. Input tax credit - ST paid on the Motor cars of seating capacity not exceeding 13 (including Driver) leased or rented with Operators to the Vendors is not available to...

  8. Sugar syrup having 78.2% sugar content emerged as an intermediary product during biscuit manufacturing, an exempted final product. CESTAT held sugar syrup was marketable...

  9. Liability to pay Service Tax when the main contractor has already paid - The Tribunal cited a circular stating sub-contractors are liable to pay Service Tax separately....

  10. The doctrine of forum non conveniens was applied to determine the maintainability of a petition u/s 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court held that...

  11. Classification of goods - original car seat covers - The AAR ruled that, the original car seat covers which are manufactured and designed to permanently fit over the raw...

  12. Determination of normal period of limitation - Extension of period from 18 months to 30 months - The amendment will not put life into dead cases but those which are...

  13. Reversal of CENVAT Credit - damage of raw material - demand invoking extended period of limitation confirmed - HC

  14. The HC held that the petitioner's exported car seat covers manufactured by it fall under HS Code 87089900 and are eligible for benefits claimed under the Merchandise...

  15. Forum for Arbitration - Seat of the arbitral proceedings - The closest connection test strongly relied upon by Mr. Himani would only apply if it is unclear that a seat...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates