Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2024 Year 2024 This

The High Court held that the petitioners have the option to file ...


Tax dispute jurisdiction clarified: Petitioners can challenge Revisionary Authority orders before High Court where original adjudication or Authority is located.

Case Laws     Central Excise

September 10, 2024

The High Court held that the petitioners have the option to file writ petitions challenging the orders of the Revisionary Authority either before the High Court within whose jurisdiction the original adjudication occurred or before the High Court within whose jurisdiction the Revisionary Authority is located. The doctrine of merger and the principle of forum conveniens allow the petitioners to choose the appropriate forum. Even if a small fraction of the cause of action arises within the territorial jurisdiction of a High Court, it will have jurisdiction. However, this factor alone may not compel the High Court to decide the matter on merits. Since the Revisionary Authority is located within the territorial jurisdiction of the Principal Seat of the High Court, the petitioners have the right to file the petitions there. The principle of merger dictates that a writ against an appellate order would lie before the High Court within whose jurisdiction the Appellate Authority is located. The High Court held that the present petitions are maintainable before its Principal Seat as the orders of the adjudicating authorities have merged into the impugned orders of the Revisionary Authority located in its jurisdiction.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Seeking service tax refund for payment of VAT liability - he petitioner had made the payment of the service tax for the periods in question voluntarily and had never...

  2. Eligibility for Input Tax Credit - Failure to report outward supply - The objection of the petitioner is that most of these items do not fall within the reverse charge...

  3. Challenge of jurisdiction u/s.120(4)(b) - If challenge to the jurisdiction has not been made within the prescribed time u/s.124(3) to the authority, whose jurisdiction...

  4. The petitioner challenged the order and summary order alleging discrepancies between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B, and excess availment of Input Tax Credit (ITC). The petitioner...

  5. The High Court addressed a challenge to assessment orders where the petitioner lacked a reasonable opportunity to contest tax demands due to discrepancies in returns....

  6. Jurisdiction for issuance of SCN - assessment in relation to the petitioner-assessee is assigned to Central Taxation Authority - the petitioner instead of challenging...

  7. Transfer of case u/s 127 - centralization of case after search - delayed challenge to the order passed u/s 153A - the impugned order came to be passed on 19.02.2019 and...

  8. High Court rejected petitioner's writ petition challenging refund rejection order, observing that respondent authority had passed reasoned order after considering...

  9. The High Court dismissed the petitioner's challenge to the reopening of assessment u/s 147, citing the petitioner's delayed compliance with notice u/s 148 and failure to...

  10. Principles of natural justice - validity of adjudication order - Exercising a jurisdiction in an irregular manner by an authority is different from exercising a...

  11. Detention of goods u/s 129(1) of CGST Act - Invoice number mentioned in Tax invoice not tallied with E-way bill - it is very much clear that the action of the...

  12. The High Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter back to the respondent authority to pass a fresh order. This was subject to the condition that the...

  13. Initiation of re-assessment proceedings/revision - Jurisdiction - The only error that appears to have crept in the order of the appeal authority as has been confirmed by...

  14. The court interpreted provisions of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 and the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation (Local Body Tax) Rules, clarifying the...

  15. The Calcutta High Court considered the maintainability of a petition challenging the penalty imposed u/s 129(3) of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates