Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2011 Year 2011 This

IT Scope of furnishing of PAN for certain financial transaction ...


PAN Now Required for LIC Payments Over 50,000 and Dealer Transactions Over 500,000.

May 28, 2011

Notifications     Income Tax

IT Scope of furnishing of PAN for certain financial transaction enhanced, payment to LIC in excess of 50K and to a dealer exceeding 5L also covered

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. HC allowed the petition and set aside the impugned order and notice u/s 148A(b). AO failed to establish that petitioner had received any amount exceeding Rs. 50,00,000/-...

  2. Demand Interest u/s 201(1A) - Non deduction TDS u/s 194IA - As per the sale deed the details of the sellers / transferors of the said property and in fact the sellers...

  3. Amendment to rules governing salary, allowances and service conditions of Chairperson and members of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India. Key changes: Chairperson's...

  4. The notification amends the National Financial Reporting Authority (Manner of Appointment and other Terms and Conditions of Service of Chairperson and Members) Rules,...

  5. The assessment years beyond six years but not exceeding ten years can be reopened u/s 153A only if the Assessing Officer possesses evidence depicting escapement of...

  6. Reversal of Input Tax Credit - proper verification of the transactions of selling/purchasing dealers to ensure that there is a match of the details of the transaction or...

  7. CIRP Proceedings - scope of preferential transactions - It was submitted that the "corporate debtor" paid a sum of ₹ 2,50,00,000 towards part payment of principal...

  8. CESTAT upheld the demand for differential duty on imported betel nuts from Indonesia, rejecting the appellant's objection regarding time limitation. The Tribunal...

  9. Reopening of assessment beyond three years requires sanction from Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, whereas the assessee obtained sanction from Principal...

  10. The petitioner sought release of an export subsidy of Rs. 8,08,50,000/-. The respondent confirmed that the milk powder exported by the petitioner, amounting to 1617...

  11. The court held that the tax liability arising from the deletion of additions under the remand order would be less than Rs. 1,00,00,000, rendering the appeal...

  12. When assessee allotted plot by Noida Authorities, entered agreement to sell on 07.02.2003 receiving Rs. 4,50,000/-, remaining Rs. 4,76,000/- paid to Noida Authorities as...

  13. Petitioner argued non-receipt of notices preceding impugned assessment orders. Partnership firm discontinued business, carried on by proprietor. Court held petitioner...

  14. Addition u/s. 68 - AO cannot extrapolate 50 and interpret 50 as 50,00,000, 575 as 575 lakhs without any corroborative/demonstrative evidence - additions made merely on...

  15. ITAT held revisionary powers under s.263 cannot be invoked as assessment order was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to Revenue's interests. During survey, assessee...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates