Petitioner argued non-receipt of notices preceding impugned ...

Court Annuls Assessment Orders, Requires Rs. 50 Lakh Deposit; Petitioner Can Respond u/ss 144 & 147.

August 9, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Petitioner argued non-receipt of notices preceding impugned assessment orders. Partnership firm discontinued business, carried on by proprietor. Court held petitioner neglected intimating firm's dissolution, surrendering PAN. Transactions made from firm's account despite alleged proprietorship. Returns filed from firm's address. Huge transactions observed. Respondent rightfully passed order u/s 144 read with 147 due to non-reply. Petitioner individually assessed requiring detailed consideration. Court quashed impugned orders, treating them as addenda to show-cause notices. Petitioner to pre-deposit Rs. 50,00,000 within eight weeks to Income Tax Department. Opportunity granted to file reply.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Petitioner argued non-receipt of notices preceding impugned ...

Court Annuls Assessment Orders, Requires Rs. 50 Lakh Deposit; Petitioner Can Respond u/ss 144 & 147.

August 9, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal against the reopening of assessment u/s 148A of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer had alleged...

HC allowed the petition and set aside the impugned order and notice u/s 148A(b). AO failed to establish that petitioner had received any amount exceeding Rs. 50,00,000/-...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Time limit for notice - Scope of new provision section 148A - The High Court following the decision of Apex Court has held that, since...

Validity of order passed by National Faceless Assessment Centre (NFAC) u/s 143 (3) read with Section 144-B - Requirement of preparing a draft assessment order u/s 144-B...

Validity of Penalty u/s 271D and u/s 271E - Penalty proceeding as independent of the assessment proceeding - absence of satisfaction recorded in the reassessment u/s 147...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - second re-assessment notice u/s 148A - The High Court noted that the petitioner did not challenge the earlier re-assessment order dated...

Assessment u/s 147, when the assessment u/s 142(1)(a); 143(3); or 144 has not been done – Without passing the assessment order, there is no occasion to pass the...

Reopening of assessment - Scope of new section/regime u/s 148A - Sense that one gets upon a holistic reading of the backdrop in which the new regime for reopening...

The High Court quashed the assessment order passed u/s 147 read with Sections 144 and 144B, as well as the consequential notices u/ss 156 and 274 read with 271AA(1) of...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Earlier, ITAT remanded the matter back requesting the AO to provide reasons for initiating reassessment proceedings. - AO must have...

Faceless assessment regime introduced new procedures codified u/s 144B for assessments u/ss 143(3), 144, and 147, while assessments u/s 144C (transfer pricing cases)...

The assessment years beyond six years but not exceeding ten years can be reopened u/s 153A only if the Assessing Officer possesses evidence depicting escapement of...

Ex parte order passed based on old PAN number challenged. Society contended all transactions accounted for in audited books, returns filed with new PAN. Department...

The High Court held that the Assessing Officer (AO) lacked sufficient material or evidence to reopen the assessment u/s 147 for the Assessment Year 2013-14 in respect of...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reopening based on audit objections - reasons to believe - High Court observed that, reopening an assessment beyond four years requires...

Quick Updates: