Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights April 2014 Year 2014 This

Duty demand - even if certain suspicion was raised by the ...


Statements Recorded by DGCEI Insufficient to Prove Clandestine Manufacturing and Clearance of Excisable Goods.

April 12, 2014

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Duty demand - even if certain suspicion was raised by the statements recorded by the investigation made by the officers of DGCEI but the same are not sufficient to hold clandestine manufacturing and clearance of excisable goods - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Clandestine removal of excisable goods alleged based on statements recorded from partners, employees, and buyers. Section 9D of Central Excise Act mandates...

  2. Clandestine manufacture and removal - plastic molded chairs - burden of proof to establish that there was clandestine manufacture - seizure of the pen drive -...

  3. The case pertains to the allegation of clandestine manufacture and clearance of structural items/rolled products by the appellant. The revenue's case rested solely on...

  4. The CESTAT set aside the demand and penalties imposed on the grounds of alleged clandestine removal, holding that the charge was not substantiated by sufficient evidence....

  5. Clandestine removal - suppression of production - Merely deposit of money at the time of investigation would not amount to acceptance of allegations of clandestine...

  6. Clandestine manufacture - tobacco snuff - It is found that to manufacture snuff of huge quantity, other raw material/packing material also required but no such evidence...

  7. Clandestine manufacture and removal of goods - cases of clandestine removal can not be established only on the basis of few statements, especially in this case where the...

  8. Smuggling - burden to prove - invocation of Section 123 - the statement recorded under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962 made before the customs officers is not a...

  9. Clandestine removal - Chewing Tobacco - the charge of clandestine removal cannot be proved merely on the basis of statement - since the charge of clandestine manufacture...

  10. The allegation of clandestine manufacturing/clearance is a serious allegation and the Department cannot merely rely on the recorded Statements alone and the...

  11. Clandestine production and removal - onus to prove - The submission of the revenue that by the recovery of the notebooks, they have discharged the burden and the onus to...

  12. When the statements and records relied upon by the revenue are not considered to be sufficient ground for clandestine removal, in that case merely on the basis of...

  13. Clandestine manufacture and clearance of Sponge Iron alleged - undervaluation demand calculated based on seized documents - retraction of statements - Section 9D of...

  14. 100% EOU - Clandestine removal - case of the department is on the ground that deemed export clearance were not genuine and were shown only on paper - The entire case of...

  15. Valuation - Reliance on the statement made before the customs officers - recording of statement u/s 108 - Certainly a statement recorded under duress or coercion cannot...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates