Duty demand - even if certain suspicion was raised by the ...

Case Laws Central Excise

April 12, 2014

Duty demand - even if certain suspicion was raised by the statements recorded by the investigation made by the officers of DGCEI but the same are not sufficient to hold clandestine manufacturing and clearance of excisable goods - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Duty demand - even if certain suspicion was raised by the ...

Case Laws Central Excise

April 12, 2014

You may also like:

Section 125(1) of SVLDR Scheme disqualifies persons subjected to enquiry/investigation where duty involved was not quantified by 30.06.2019. Section 121(m) defines...

Procedure for recording statement u/s 108 - When the petitioners’ case is verified with reference to the available material on record, it creates prima facie suspicion...

Scope of order of the tribunal - The Tribunal has failed to record any reasons with respect to seven out of eight questions raised in the reference applications. It is...

Use of materials seized and the statement furnished by the third parties against the assessee - the opportunity for the rebuttal to the assessee for the seized documents...

Recovery of CENVAT Credit alongwith interest and penalty - second stage dealers were issuing invoices without actually supplying goods - Examining the records of each of...

Undisclosed income - retraction of the statement - the assessee has been consistent in his statements so recorded even during the post search proceedings when his...

Valuation - Reliance on the statement made before the customs officers - recording of statement u/s 108 - Certainly a statement recorded under duress or coercion cannot...

Clandestine removal of manufactured goods - Demand of duty along with interest and penalty - Evasion of duty - Kachcha slips recovered during investigation which were...

Validity of statement - retraction of statement - the statement recorded u/s. 132(4) cannot be discarded merely because the retractment statements were filed. The...

Levy of penalty u/s 114 - corroborative evidences like statements of the co-noticees - it is clear that the statements of a person made under Section 108 of the Act 1962...

Demand of duty - receipt of inputs or not - demand based on statements of the suppliers of the inputs - cross-examination not allowed - Revenue has no other evidence -...

The demand for recovery of Cenvat Credit was made without proper verification and investigation, based on assumptions and presumptions. The investigation covered only 67...

This notification amends various earlier customs duty notifications by making changes to the tariff item entries, descriptions, and rates of duty applicable to certain...

Smuggling - burden to prove - invocation of Section 123 - the statement recorded under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962 made before the customs officers is not a...

Assessment of trust - Unaccounted fee receipts - reliance on statement recorded u/s 133A of Accountant of the Society - It is a settled law that statement recorded...

Quick Updates: