Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2014 Year 2014 This

Condonation of delay - Bar of limitation - The starting point of ...


Appeal Deadline u/s 35 Starts When Order is Communicated to Assessee; Fact-Based Start Point Crucial.

May 22, 2014

Case Laws     Central Excise     HC

Condonation of delay - Bar of limitation - The starting point of limitation under Section 35 was the date of communication of the order which was required to be decided with reference to the facts pleaded by the assessee. - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Validity of Appeal filed by AOP having PAN issued as Individual - CIT(A) did not adjudicate the issue on merits in accordance with the provisions of section 250(6) of...

  2. Deduction u/s 35(1)(ii) disallowed by AO based on Investigation Wing's report alleging bogus donations receipts issued by institutions. ITAT held AO did not make...

  3. The assessee claimed weighted deduction u/s 35(1)(ii) for donation made to M/s Shri Arvindo Institute of Applied Scientific Research Trust at the end of the year. The...

  4. Condonation of delay in filing appeal u/s 35(1) - The power to condone the delay conferred upon the Commissioner (Appeals) ends if the appeal is preferred after 30 days...

  5. The ITAT ruled that denial of weighted deduction under s.35(2AB) does not prevent the assessee from claiming normal deduction for R&D expenditure under s.35(1)(i)...

  6. Deduction u/s 35(1)(ii) - Disallowance of donation made to School of Human Genetics & Population Health, Kolkata - The assessee would be eligible for benefit of weighted...

  7. Maintainability of appeal - time limitation - appeal filed before Commissioner (Appeals) after a delay of 11 months - More time has been taken by the department for...

  8. Appealable order or not - Letter written by the Superintendent directing, the assessee for not availing Cenvat Credit - in the facts of the present case the letter...

  9. Penalty u/s 270A(9) for mis-reporting of income due to excess claim of ineligible expenditure u/s 35(2AB) was imposed. The Dispute Resolution Panel (DSIR) certificate in...

  10. Weighted deduction u/s 35(1)(ii) - bogus donations - the donors in connivance with various brokers, entry operators, donees etc. misued the benefit conferred u/s...

  11. Deduction u/s 35(2AB) - Expenditure which was not eligible for weighted deduction u/s 35(2AB) - scientific research and development expenditure - such R&D expenditure...

  12. Exemption u/s 35(2AB) - there was no approval in form No. 3CM - what is relevant to decide eligibility for weighted deduction u/s 35(2AB) is existence of R&D facility...

  13. The assessee received funds from DSIR, repayable as royalty equaling 1.3 times the amount, which the AO treated as royalty disallowing weighted deduction u/s 35(2AB)....

  14. CIT(Appeals) dismissed assessee's appeal for non-prosecution despite assessee being afforded multiple opportunities to participate. However, CIT(Appeals) failed to...

  15. 100% EOU - Debonding of EOU - Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) dismissed the appeal on the ground that, the petitioner had sought to invoke the provisions of Section 35...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates