Levy of penalty penalty u/s 271(1)(c) after remand - AO could ...

High Court Rules Penalty for Income Concealment Unlawful Without Explicit Direction in Revisional Order u/s 271(1)(c.

June 3, 2014

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Levy of penalty penalty u/s 271(1)(c) after remand - AO could not have in the first instance, after remand, without any direction or indication in the revisional order initiate the penalty proceedings - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty penalty u/s 271(1)(c) after remand - AO could ...

High Court Rules Penalty for Income Concealment Unlawful Without Explicit Direction in Revisional Order u/s 271(1)(c.

June 3, 2014

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the assessee's appeal and directed the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act to be deleted. The Assessing Officer...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - recording of satisfaction - mere direction in the assessment order to initiate penalty proceedings - Concealment/furnishing inaccurate...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) for concealment of income was challenged. The Assessing Officer (AO) alleged that the assessee understated turnover and concealed income...

Voluntary surrender of income by assessee cannot be considered concealment. AO failed to prove concealment, merely concluded voluntary surrender as concealment....

Penalty u/s 271(l)(c) - it is a case where the hypothesis of there being a concealment of income and there not being concealment of income are equal - no penalty - AT

Penalty for concealment of income Under Section 271(1) (c) - Article

The crux pertains to levying penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for alleged furnishing of inaccurate particulars or concealment of income regarding capital gains computation on sale...

Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

The ITAT Surat held that the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was not sustainable due to a defective notice and estimation of income on bogus purchases. The notice u/s 274 was...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) concerning the correct classification of income. The Assessing Officer treated the income as 'income...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - recording of satisfaction - penalty initiated u/s 143(3) order for concealment of particulars of income - penalty imposed for furnishing of...

Assessee, a non-resident Indian, did not file return of income for AY 2014-15 as TDS on interest income from investment was deducted at 12.5% instead of 10% under...

Penalty u/s 271(1) (c) - period of limitation - treatment of lease rent income - in the revised return, assessee claimed the same as income from house property to claim...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was levied by the Assessing Officer solely based on the order of the Income Tax Settlement Commission withdrawing immunity from penalty and...

Quick Updates: