Failure to deposit the monthly duty liability in terms of rule ...

Appellant's Failure to Deposit Duty per Rule 8(1) Leads to Tribunal and High Court Upholding Demand Despite Cenvat Credit Use.

June 4, 2014

Case Laws Central Excise HC

Failure to deposit the monthly duty liability in terms of rule 8(1) of the Central Excise Rules - It was the Cenvat credit which was utilized by the appellant despite the default. - demand as confirmed by the tribunal sustained - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Failure to deposit the monthly duty liability in terms of rule ...

Appellant's Failure to Deposit Duty per Rule 8(1) Leads to Tribunal and High Court Upholding Demand Despite Cenvat Credit Use.

June 4, 2014

Case Laws Central Excise HC

You may also like:

The Appellate Tribunal found the Appellant Company guilty of contravening u/s 9(1)(a) of FERA 1973 by making payments to a person outside India without RBI permission....

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - failure on the part of legal heir of the deceased assessee to explain the source of part of the deposits - The mere failure on the part of the...

Stay of demand / pre-deposit - Levy of penalty - Contravention of Section 18(2) of FERA - failure to realize export proceeds - Appellant contended that the order of the...

Interpretation of Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944, regarding the recovery of amounts collected as excise duty but not deposited with the government. The key...

Addition u/s 69A - unexplained cash deposits in the saving bank - The tribunal found the orders of the Revenue authorities to be arbitrary, with a failure to consider...

Classification of imported goods - Narrow Woven Fabric Webbing - The tribunal noted that the appellant's actions in misclassifying goods from a specific country...

Refund of Pre-deposit alongwith interest - Adjustment of pre-deposit with pending demand - A pre-deposit would become refundable the moment an Appellate Authority comes...

Contravention of Sections 8(1) and 9(1)(f)(i) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - receiving foreign exchange payments in 1996-97 through fake export documents...

Scope of Deposits - amounts collected by the petitioners for sale of immovable property as advance - would come under the purview of ‘deposits’ or would exempt from the...

CESTAT Mumbai addressed a case involving a differential Central Excise duty demand u/s 11A(4) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant discharged the duty upon...

Levy of redemption fine and penalty - provisional release of goods - the appellant paid entire amount of the differential duty along with interest thereon and 15% duty...

Interest on the pre-deposit - The Tribunal found that the issue revolved around whether the appellants were entitled to interest on the pre-deposit u/s 35FF of the...

Maintainability of appeal - requirement of mandatory pre-deposit - appellate has deposited entire amount of duty (100% of duty) instead of 7.5% / 10% - Only demand of...

The Appellate Tribunal examined the reopening of assessment u/s 147 beyond the limitation period, involving the addition of cash deposits in the assessee's savings bank...

The case involves contravention of Section 8(1) of FERA, 1973. The Appellate Tribunal held that the transfer of money from an NRE account, even if received in Indian...

Quick Updates: