Revision u/s 263 upheld for a limited purpose that the claim of ...

CIT Exceeded Authority by Directing AO to Deny Section 10B Claim Without Investigation; Revision Upheld for Limited Review.

January 28, 2015

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Revision u/s 263 upheld for a limited purpose that the claim of deduction u/s.10B was allowed by AO without proper investigation. - But simultaneously, CIT has exceeded the jurisdiction by unilaterally directing the AO to pass a fresh order by disallowing the claim u/s.10B - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 upheld for a limited purpose that the claim of ...

CIT Exceeded Authority by Directing AO to Deny Section 10B Claim Without Investigation; Revision Upheld for Limited Review.

January 28, 2015

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Jurisdiction of CIT (A) while passing an order in appeal u/s 250 - Validity of assessment framed without issue of notice u/s. 143(2) - whether CIT (A) has exceeded his...

AO exceeded jurisdiction by disallowing claim of brought forward unabsorbed depreciation through rectification u/s 154, as CIT(A) did not direct such disallowance....

Revision u/s 263 - As the assessment was completed after making required amount of enquiry and there was no lake of enquiry or investigation by the AO on the issues...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - mistake of non-initiation or incorrect initiation of penalty - the inherent indication u/s 271(1) makes it clear that the Pr. CIT / CIT does...

Income from house properties OR business income - By simply sitting in the office, AO just assigned the reason that I don’t agree with your submission. - the ld.Revenue...

Assessment proceedings examined assessee's claim relating to ICDS adjustment made in intimation u/s 143(1). AO issued notices seeking information, assessee provided...

Revision u/s 263 involving excess deduction of transport expenses and non-deduction of TDS on transportation charges. CIT held AO failed to verify adequately, rendering...

AO suo-moto framed the order u/s. 154 and rectified the order - AO framed order u/s. 154 of the Act without affording a reasonable and adequate opportunity of being...

The assessee, a university, claimed exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiab) for the relevant assessment year, which was accepted by the Assessing Officer (AO) after considering the...

CIT(A) determined profit at 5.47% on total purchases. Assessee produced sufficient evidence regarding purchases, movement of goods, GST payment on transportation,...

Revision u/s 263 - Ld. Pr. CIT exercising jurisdiction under section 263 of the Act, directed the AO to make fresh assessment on the issues which were not the subject...

Revision u/s 263 - as per CIT AO had wrongly allowed the assessee exemption of capital gains claimed u/s 54B - Tribunal found that neither any inquiry was made by the AO...

The ITAT addressed various issues including disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r.8D, where Revenue challenged deletion of disallowance made by AO. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision,...

Revision petition u/s. 264 - disallowance of carry forward of loss to subsequent years - CIT while disposing of the 264 petition of the assessee, had clearly directed...

CIT invoked revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 alleging AO did not examine provision for subcontracting expenses and refund claim during reassessment proceedings. Assessee...

Quick Updates: