The ITAT addressed various issues including disallowance u/s 14A ...

Tax Tribunal Upholds Deletion of Disallowance; Supports Fresh Deduction Claim and Validates Revised Return on ERV Loss.

June 10, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The ITAT addressed various issues including disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r.8D, where Revenue challenged deletion of disallowance made by AO. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision, finding AO incorrectly treated expenses as direct, supporting Assessee's claim. CIT(A) correctly presumed investments made from interest-free funds. AO erred in not accepting Assessee's computation of disallowance, hence ITAT deleted disallowance u/s 14A. ITAT allowed Assessee's fresh claim for deduction u/s 37(1) for ERV loss, remanding for verification. ITAT upheld deduction of establishment expenses as revenue expenditure. ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal on inclusion of ERV in inventory valuation. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s order on Book Profits u/s 115JB and provision for Leave Encashment u/s 43B(f). ITAT supported Assessee's additional claim for ERV loss deduction, finding AO's rejection erroneous post accepting revised return.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ITAT addressed various issues including disallowance u/s 14A ...

Tax Tribunal Upholds Deletion of Disallowance; Supports Fresh Deduction Claim and Validates Revised Return on ERV Loss.

June 10, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal considered whether an assessee can claim deduction under Chapter VI-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the first time in the return...

The assessee failed to deduct tax on professional fees paid to various non-residents. The Assessing Officer (AO) held that the fees were liable to tax in India under the...

Regarding the deduction u/s 80IA, the Tribunal affirmed that ground handling and cargo handling services provided by the assessee were covered within the scope of...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has adjudicated on various issues concerning deductions u/ss 80IA(4), 14A, and 35D. Regarding Section 80IA(4) deduction, the...

Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - External Development Charges(EDC) paid to HUDA without deduction of tax at source - TDS on EDC u/s 194C/194I - The tribunal concluded that...

The tribunal affirmed the decision of the CIT(A) to admit additional evidence under Rule 46A, leading to the deletion of disallowance on depreciation claims....

CIT(A) restricted addition on account of accommodation entries to 15% instead of 100%, as the Assessing Officer failed to establish that work was not actually performed....

The assessee, a company engaged in development/construction and sale of flats and plots, had classified its properties into four categories: flats open for sale, let-out...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowances in the quantum assessment order - whether any concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars proved? - Tribunal directs...

Assessee voluntarily declared income under "income from other sources" in return. AO disallowed deduction claimed for coordination and settlement expenses due to lack of...

The preliminary assessment u/s 143(1) is limited to processing the return for arithmetical errors, incorrect expense claims, verifying audit reports, deductions, and...

The ITAT held that the CIT (A) erred in admitting additional evidence without following Rule 46A. Deletion of additions on forfeited amount and various expenses was...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed three main issues raised by the Assessee against the assessment order. Firstly, regarding the disallowance of job work charges to a...

Disallowance u/s 80P - claim disallowed u/sec. 143(1)(a)(ii) by way of “processing” as an instance of “incorrect claim if such incorrect claim is there from any...

The ITAT held that the order passed u/s 263 by the PCIT was in gross violation of the principles of natural justice. The Tribunal observed that the order disregarded the...

Quick Updates: