Penalty levied u/s 158BFA(2) - Tribunal has sustained the ...

Case Laws Income Tax

March 7, 2015

Penalty levied u/s 158BFA(2) - Tribunal has sustained the addition on estimate basis and the Tribunal could not come a conclusion from the seized material that there was undisclosed income in incurring interior decoration works - No Penalty - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty levied u/s 158BFA(2) - Tribunal has sustained the ...

Case Laws Income Tax

March 7, 2015

You may also like:

Levy of penalty u/s 158BFA(2) - penalty has been levied on the amount of undisclosed income without providing any working of maximum and minimum penalty leviable - No penalty - AT

The ITAT Mumbai ruled on penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for estimation of income on bogus purchases. The tribunal held that penalty cannot be levied on additions made on an...

Levy of penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - estimation of disallowance at 50% of commission and improvement expenditure - in this case, the additions were made on the basis of...

Penalty levied u/ss 271(1)(c) and 271AAA for unexplained investment and addition made by adopting net profit as per the books of accounts at 12.85% on the suppressed...

Addition u/s 50C r.w.s. 56(2)(vii) (b) - the buyer of the property - The Tribunal (ITAT) ruled that since the assesses were buyers, Section 50C did not apply, and...

Assessment u/s 153A - Addition of bogus purchases on protective basis in the hands of the assessee - Unless, it is brought over knowledge the fate of substantive...

Penalty under section 158BFA(2) - Assessment proceedings and penalty proceedings are different and independent to each other. The addition or part of the addition could...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

The crux pertains to levying penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for alleged furnishing of inaccurate particulars or concealment of income regarding capital gains computation on sale...

Validity of the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) or 158BFA - AO has levied the penalty under section 271(1)(C) of the Act by observing that the assessee has concealed/furnished...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the levy of penalty u/s 270A. The Assessing Officer (AO) imposed the penalty u/s 270A(9)(a) for misrepresentation of facts and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - estimation of income - bogus purchases - penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be levied where the addition is made on estimate basis - AT

Confirmation of penalty u/s 158BFA(2) of the Act – Furnishing of inaccurate particulars - U additons have been upheld on estimation basis , thus, no penalty is leviable - AT

The Appellate Tribunal held that despite the addition u/s 69B of the Income Tax Act being justified, the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) cannot be levied due to ambiguity...

The Appellate Tribunal held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on estimated additions due to bogus purchases from hawala dealers was unjustified as the assessee failed to...

Quick Updates: