The proceedings for imposition of penalty u/s 158BFA(2) were ...

Case Laws Income Tax

July 22, 2016

The proceedings for imposition of penalty u/s 158BFA(2) were initiated on the basis of earlier finding by the AO. However not only undisclosed income has been reduced but the basis for calculating the undisclosed income has also been changed, in our view, the imposition of penalty, was not warranted - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

The proceedings for imposition of penalty u/s 158BFA(2) were ...

Case Laws Income Tax

July 22, 2016

You may also like:

Once proceedings of penalty us 273(2)(a) or sec.273(2)(aa) have not been initiated in the regular assessment by AO, then penalty proceedings cannot be initiated in the...

The court held that Section 6(2)(b) of the Act treats the empowered officers under the SGST/UGST Act at the central level to be at par and does not prescribe for...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - in the assessment order, AO has made it clear that penalty proceedings are initiated separately for furnishing...

Penalty u/s 272A(2)(g) was levied for not issuing TDS certificates in Form 16A to deductees on time. The issue pertained to the period of limitation for issuing the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - AO has not applied his mind before initiating the penalty proceedings rather borrowed his satisfaction from the “tax...

Penalty levied u/s 271 (1) (c) - As the appellants had disclosed the income, after detection by the department and as per the terms of settlement, the assessing officer...

Proceedings initiated u/s 144C - legality of the order by framing the so-called draft assessment order - while framing the said draft assessment order, the AO not only...

Penalty u/s 158BFA(2) - willful attempt - assessee has given the explanation in respect of source of jewellery - no case of imposition of penalty - AT

Penalty u/s 271D - violation of provisions u/s 269SS - cash receipt claimed as advance against sales - recording of the satisfaction by the AO is sine qua non for...

Excess stock found during survey at petitioner's business premises triggered initiation of proceedings u/s 130 of GST Act. Court held if excess stock is found,...

Levy of penalty - Whether imposition of penalty under Section 43(2) of the Orissa Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (OVAT Act) can only be levied if the escapement is “without...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Validity of notice - It is a well settled proposition of law that penalty cannot be initiated for the limb, which is different from the limb for...

Penalty under section 158BFA(2) - Assessment proceedings and penalty proceedings are different and independent to each other. The addition or part of the addition could...

Initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271C and the limitation period for levying such penalty. The key points are: The penalty proceedings were initiated on the date of...

Penalty imposed u/s 271AAA - in the penultimate paragraph of the assessment order the Assessing Officer has initiated proceedings for imposition of penalty under section...

Quick Updates: