Prosecution proceedings may continue ever where demand of duty ...

Case Laws Central Excise

April 30, 2015

Prosecution proceedings may continue ever where demand of duty was set aside on the ground of period of limitation since there is no limitation period for initiation of prosecution proceedings - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Prosecution proceedings may continue ever where demand of duty ...

Case Laws Central Excise

April 30, 2015

You may also like:

Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

Clandestine removal of goods denied CENVAT credit. Liability for duty, interest, and penalty from FY 2007-08 to 2011-12 assessed. Differential duty demand of Rs....

Extended period of limitation – Revenue neutrality - Demand set aside - AT

Prosecution u/s 276C(1) - willful default of payment of tax - There is no doubt that penalty proceeding and prosecution can go simultaneously in the facts and...

Clandestine removal demand based on electricity consumption not sustainable as mere electricity consumption cannot be the sole basis for determining duty liability....

Where criminal proceedings ended in acquittal but simultaneous departmental proceedings continued, the result of the criminal proceedings will not have any bearing on...

Duty demand - sizing and warping machines which is assembled at site - whether manufacturing activity or not - demand set aside on the ground of jurisdiction and...

Liability to pay Service Tax when the main contractor has already paid - The Tribunal cited a circular stating sub-contractors are liable to pay Service Tax separately....

Valuation - third party inspection charges cannot be included in transaction value - Supreme Court held cost of transportation from place of removal to delivery excluded...

Clandestine removal - aluminium circles - it is found that Revenue has taken contrary stand wherein in the first show cause notice it is admitted that assessee has...

Prosecution, u/s 132(1)(c) of the Central Act - parallel proceedings u/s 74 - There is no principle in law as may warrant any interference in the present petition to...

Delayed adjudication of show cause notice without reasonable cause - Delay in finalizing assessments and issuing demand - Classification of goods under appropriate...

Target Plus Scheme – validity of circular - circular dated 8 May 2007 quashed and set aside - HC

The High Court held that prosecution u/ss 276C, 277, 278B, and 278E for tax evasion was invalid as it violated CBDT guidelines. Prosecution was premature without the...

The demand for recovery of Cenvat Credit was made without proper verification and investigation, based on assumptions and presumptions. The investigation covered only 67...

Quick Updates: