Possession of disproportionate assets / surplus income - The ...

Court Rules 8.12% Disproportionate Assets Below Legal Threshold, Considered Permissible.

May 14, 2015

Case Laws Indian Laws HC

Possession of disproportionate assets / surplus income - The percentage of disproportionate assets is 8.12%. It is relatively small. In the instant case, the disproportionate asset is less than 10% and it is within permissible limit - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Possession of disproportionate assets / surplus income - The ...

Court Rules 8.12% Disproportionate Assets Below Legal Threshold, Considered Permissible.

May 14, 2015

Case Laws Indian Laws HC

You may also like:

Right of the auction purchaser of the property - Right of the Defaulter of Loan / Borrowers to redeem the secured property - in accordance with the unamended Section...

Disproportionate assets were acquired by the accused person by commission of offence under the Prevention of Corruption Act, and there are no infirmity in the order of...

Penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Contravention of Rule 8(3A) - penalty under Rule 25 is not permissible, but penalty under Rule 27 is to be imposed - AT

The High Court considered a challenge to the charge sheet and taking cognizance of offences u/ss 13 (1) (d), 13 (1) (e) of the PC Act and Section 109 of IPC. The...

CENVAT Credit - restrictions in using the cenvat credit for payment of duty for the clearances - Pursuant to quashing of Rule 8(3A) by the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court,...

Vires of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - At least four different High Courts have struck down the constitutional validity of Rule 8(3A) of Central Excise...

Since Appellant were paying the duty utilizing the CENVAT Credit they cannot be charged for contravention of the provisions of Rule 4, 8(1), 8(3) & 8(3A) of the Central...

Income-tax (seventh Amendment) Rules, 2012 - Amends rule 12(1) - Notification

The High Court considered an application for compounding contravention under FEMA. The petitioner filed Form FC-TRS belatedly, leading to investigations and complaints....

Valuation of goods - Applicability of Rule 8 on Job work - Rule 8 and Rule 9 are not applicable - Once Rule 8 is not applicable in the case of the respondent, it is Rule...

Profiteering - purchase of a flat - allegation that GST @12% was charged instead of 8% - as noticed from the demand letter Applicant had charged GST @ 12% on the taxable...

Denial of Input tax credit - on the date of introduction of sub Rule (8) of Rule 21 of the Rules, the State did not possess any power, emanating from the Act - on the...

Agricultural land which is beyond 8 Kms from municipal limits is not a capital asset - AT

The adjudicating authority is bound to explain the alleged contraventions to the person proceeded against or their legal representatives. Rule 4(4) mandates...

Dispute centered on Rule 21(8) of Punjab VAT Rules regarding input tax credit (ITC) calculations following tax rate reduction on iron and steel goods. SC upheld HC's...

Quick Updates: