Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
GST - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2019 Year 2019 This

Profiteering - purchase of a flat - allegation that GST @12% was ...

Case Laws     GST

May 25, 2019

Profiteering - purchase of a flat - allegation that GST @12% was charged instead of 8% - as noticed from the demand letter Applicant had charged GST @ 12% on the taxable value which was 2/3rd of the total value. Therefore, the effective rate of GST was 8% on the total value of ₹ 3,21,124/-will be to 8% - applicant has admitted her mistake and withdrawn her complaint

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The respondent commenced a real estate project "Swastik Heights" in the post-GST regime, with commencement certificate issued on 08.03.2018 and GST registration...

  2. Profiteering - supply of construction services related to the purchase of Flat - where the project was launched after introduction of GST, booking/price of the flat has...

  3. Profiteering - flat bought in the Respondent's project - The Respondent had sold 85 units before receipt of Occupancy Certificate out of which 32 units were in...

  4. Profiteering - purchase of Flat - allegation that the benefit of reduction in the rate of tax or ITC had not been passed on - the Respondent had launched the subject...

  5. Profiteering - purchase of flat - Respondent directed to refund / repay both the profiteered amount @2.61% of the taxable amount (base price) and the GST on the said...

  6. Profiteering - purchase of flats - benefit of Input Tax Credit had not been passed on to the Applicant - The Authority determined amount of Rs. 85,77,419/- (including...

  7. Profiteering - purchase of Duplex Row House - it is alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of ITC although he had charged GST @12% w.e.f. 01.07.2017...

  8. Profiteering - purchase of fiats - it is alleged that the benefit of input tax credit had not been passed on to the Applicant No. 1 and Applicant No, 2 by way of...

  9. Profiteering - purchase of Flat no. A-802 in Respondent’s project “Azea Botanica” - allegation that benefit of reduction in the rate of GST not passed on - contravention...

  10. Profiteering - purchase of Flat - allegation is that the benefit of input tax credit had not been passed on - project was not under execution before coming into force of...

  11. Profiteering - supply of Services by way of admission to exhibition of cinematography films - There is no dispute relating to the fact that the Respondent has increased...

  12. Service of notice - initiation of CIRP - in the present case, the Bill / Invoice was raised against, M/s Flywheel Logistics Private Limited, whereas the mandatory demand...

  13. Profiteering - purchase of flats / shops - it is alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of ITC to him by way of commensurate reduction in prices and...

  14. Profiteering - supply of restaurant service - The Respondent was legally not required to collect the excess GST and therefore, he has not only violated the provisions of...

  15. Initiation of CIRP - pre-existence of dispute - There was no dispute existing prior to the first demand notice and only disputes raised prior to the first demand notice...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates