The ld. CIT(A) confirmed the addition of ₹ 1 lac on ...

Commissioner Confirms Rs. 1 Lakh Addition for Commission Payments Due to Lack of Evidence from Assessee.

July 9, 2015

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The ld. CIT(A) confirmed the addition of ₹ 1 lac on estimated basis when commission payments are specified amount, the CIT(A) should have confirmed the whole commission payment - Therefore, in absence of proper evidence with the assessee for claiming the expenditure as incurred wholly and exclusively for the business purposes, we confirm the addition of whole amount - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ld. CIT(A) confirmed the addition of ₹ 1 lac on ...

Commissioner Confirms Rs. 1 Lakh Addition for Commission Payments Due to Lack of Evidence from Assessee.

July 9, 2015

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The assessee filed a revised return of income to correct the addition based on professional receipts in the original return. The hospital made a total payment of Rs....

Addition of fixed deposits and interest thereon in wife's name was deleted as the Revenue could not controvert that the deposits belonged to the assessee's wife from her...

Contravention of Sections 8(1) and 9(1)(f)(i) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - receiving foreign exchange payments in 1996-97 through fake export documents...

Addition u/s 68 OR 41(1) - unexplained cash credit - Cessation of liability - The appellant contested additions to their income, alleging bogus sundry creditors. Despite...

ITAT modified multiple additions in a tax appeal concerning bogus purchases and unexplained money. For contested purchases of Rs. 13,80,63,994, ITAT directed application...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal against the reopening of assessment u/s 148A of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer had alleged...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

Expenditure on remuneration of employees (i.e., four servants and two drivers) - confirmed the addition at Rs.1.50 lakhs as against at Rs.4.68 lakhs by the CIT(A) - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - adjustment made u/s 92CA - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on the adjustment made u/s 92CA is not...

Finance Bill 2025 provides "unprecedented tax relief" with income tax rebate increased to Rs 12 lakh per annum (Rs 12.75 lakh for salaried class after standard...

The ITAT held that the assessment years 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12 were beyond the 10-year limitation period u/s 153C read with Explanation-1 to section 153A. Hence,...

Transfer of property deemed as short-term capital gain due to holding period less than 36 months, disallowing deduction u/s 54F. Additions for difference in commission...

The ITAT Jodhpur allowed admission of additional evidence u/r 46A of IT Rules by CIT(A) to delete addition on merits. The tribunal found merit in the evidence provided...

The CESTAT disposed of the appeal with the following key holdings: Undervaluation relating to stock transfer to their own unit and sale to sister unit was held not...

Belated payment of GST after due date of filing return u/s 139(1) - disallowance u/s 43B - assessee's failure to discharge statutory dues by actual payment within due...

Quick Updates: