The ld. CIT(A) confirmed the addition of ₹ 1 lac on ...

Case Laws Income Tax

July 9, 2015

The ld. CIT(A) confirmed the addition of ₹ 1 lac on estimated basis when commission payments are specified amount, the CIT(A) should have confirmed the whole commission payment - Therefore, in absence of proper evidence with the assessee for claiming the expenditure as incurred wholly and exclusively for the business purposes, we confirm the addition of whole amount - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

The ld. CIT(A) confirmed the addition of ₹ 1 lac on ...

Case Laws Income Tax

July 9, 2015

You may also like:

Addition u/s 40A - sum paid in cash in respect of purchase of the two immoveable properties - Sale deed has been executed on 18.8.2013 and the payment has been made on...

Penalty levied u/ss 271(1)(c) and 271AAA for unexplained investment and addition made by adopting net profit as per the books of accounts at 12.85% on the suppressed...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition made on protected assessment - addition in this case was made on protected assessment/addition on estimated basis which is against the law - AT

Rate of commission on the business of providing accommodation entry - It is just and proper to estimate the average commission @ 0.30% (30 paise to ₹ 1 per ₹...

Addition of contract receipts - bogus activity - Estimation of income - The AO had made an addition to the assessee's income, alleging discrepancies in the contract...

In the case, ITAT decided on two main issues: 1. Addition on account of Gold and Silver Jewellery u/s 69A: Assessee disclosed Rs. 70,00,000 as unexplained investment...

Addition towards the ‘Annual Lettable Value‘(“ALV”) of a property owned - property jointly owned by the assessee - as the rent of ₹ 60,000/- ( ½ share) received by...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - estimation of income - bogus purchases - penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be levied where the addition is made on estimate basis - AT

The ITAT Mumbai ruled on penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for estimation of income on bogus purchases. The tribunal held that penalty cannot be levied on additions made on an...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - inadvertent mistake - assessee, the returned income was ₹ 35.37 crores and an error of ₹ 1,30,869/- and ₹ 1,01,956/-, which the...

DDT proposed to be removed; to lead to estimated annual revenue forgone of ₹ 25,000 crore

EPCG benefit - violation of Section 45 of the Customs Act - goods were shifted without payment of duty and without authorization of the proper officer - reducing the...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

₹ 1,10,828 crore GST Gross Revenue collected for January, 2020

GST Revenue collection in the month of April 2018 exceeds ₹ 1 Lakh Crore

Quick Updates: