Clandestine removal - appellant in explaining that there was no ...

Appellant Challenges Demand Based on Misinterpretation of Confessional Statements; Authorities Ignored Key Plea on Quantity Discrepancy.

August 20, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise SC

Clandestine removal - appellant in explaining that there was no difference in the quantities and thus, no question of any clandestine removal, the said plea has not been adverted to - Demand cannot be confirmed merely on the basis of wrong interpretation of Confessional statements - SC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Clandestine removal - appellant in explaining that there was no ...

Appellant Challenges Demand Based on Misinterpretation of Confessional Statements; Authorities Ignored Key Plea on Quantity Discrepancy.

August 20, 2015

Case Laws Central Excise SC

You may also like:

The summary focuses on the rejection of cross-examination of DRI officers and a co-noticee by the competent authority. The main objective of cross-examination is to...

Additions u/s 153A solely based on a sketchy statement of an accountant u/s 132(4), which in turn is based on a confessional statement of a director in a previous...

Central Excise demands cannot be sustained solely based on confessional statements without corroborative documentary evidence. Retracted affidavits cannot be relied upon...

The CESTAT held that the appellant could not be implicated solely based on the retracted confessional statement of the co-accused. The telephonic call between them was...

Whether the confessional statement of the appellant given to the Customs officers u/s 108 of the Customs Act, 1962 though retracted at a later stage, is admissible in...

Disciplinary proceedings - allegation of misconduct - Proceedings against ex-Superintendent of Central Excise - Reliance on confessional statements made by accused...

Validity of conviction made - conviction based solely on the purported confessional statement recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act - evidentiary value present or...

Clandestine removal demand based on electrical consumption was challenged. Average electricity consumption for certain periods was calculated. Cross-examination of...

Addition on account of the peak unaccounted investment - addition on the basis of confessional statement - There was no material to corroborate the statement made by the...

Demand of duty - receipt of inputs or not - demand based on statements of the suppliers of the inputs - cross-examination not allowed - Revenue has no other evidence -...

Additions on the basis of statement - This provision embedded in sub-section (4) is obviously based on the well established rule of evidence that mere confessional...

Extended period of limitation - Demand based on Form 26AS (TDS Statement) - The Notice in this case was issued on 08.09.2021, demanding service tax for the period...

Penalty levied u/s 112(b) of Customs Act challenged due to lack of proper evidence. Appellant obtained PNR movement documents from steamer agent for cargo movement from...

Clandestine manufacture and clearance of excisable goods - the case is not merely made on the basis of few confessional statements but also on the basis of private note...

Personal penalty on the charge of forgery of Textile Committee report - It is found that forgery is a very serious charge which should be proved by clear and cogent...

Quick Updates: