Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
VAT - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2015 Year 2015 This

Sale against ST-1 Form - DVAT - correctness of ST-1 - denial of ...


Court Rules Assessee Not Liable for ST-2 Discrepancies in DVAT Sales; Fault Lies with Purchasing Dealer.

September 7, 2015

Case Laws     VAT and Sales Tax     HC

Sale against ST-1 Form - DVAT - correctness of ST-1 - denial of deduction - Assessee could not be held responsible for any discrepancy in the ST-2 Account furnished by the purchasing dealer to the Sales Tax Authorities. - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Levy of penalty - taking CENVAT Credit irregularly - it is the contention of the Assessee that there is some element of discretion available in the adjudicating officer...

  2. Validity of assessment order - Discrepancy Nos. 1, 2, 10, and 11: The discrepancies include issues such as non-GST supplies, alleged mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-1...

  3. Bogus purchases - department had neither disputed the assessee's sales nor shown any discrepancy between the purchases shown and the sales declared - the Tribunal was...

  4. The High Court held that respondent No. 3 cannot avoid deciding the petitioners' application dated 20 December 2023 seeking an advance ruling on the taxability of sale...

  5. Disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D - the AO has not computed any disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(i) and Rule 8D(2)(ii) of the Rules and only under Rule 8D(2)(iii) of...

  6. Claim of refund - SEZ unit - Notification No. 09/2009-ST and 17/2011-ST - mere supply of surplus power in DTA as mentioned in Rule 47 of SEZ Rules, cannot be construed...

  7. Sections 16(2)(c) and 16(2)(d) of the Assam and Central Goods and Services Tax Acts, 2017, were challenged regarding the validity of punishing a purchasing dealer for...

  8. Addition u/s 14A r.w. Rule 8D(2)(iii) - In the present case, wherein the assessee does not offer any disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(ii) in respect of exempt income, then...

  9. The assessee purchased agricultural land whose stamp duty valuation was lower than the actual purchase consideration. The authorities sought to invoke section 56(2)(x)...

  10. Tax collected at source (TCS) u/s 206C on sale of scrap - Revenue treated assessee as "defaulter" for non-collection of TCS u/s 206C. Held: Sale categorized into three...

  11. Scope of Deposits - amounts collected by the petitioners for sale of immovable property as advance - would come under the purview of ‘deposits’ or would exempt from the...

  12. Bogus sale purchase transactions - providing accommodation entries - Though it is not the case of reopening but assessment, hence the higher burden lies on the assessee...

  13. Availment of CENVAT Credit - Non maintenance of separate account - When it is impossible to comply with the provisions of sub-rule (2) of Rule 6, it would not be...

  14. Addition of income u/s 56(2)(x)(b)(B) - under valuation of stamp duty value on purchase consideration of the property u/s 50C - The assessee asserts that only a partial...

  15. Place of provision of service - Export of services or not - POPOS Rules - while relying on Rule 2(i)(b)(ii) the revenue ignores the existence of Rule 2(i)(b)(i) while...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates